Acupuncture and dry-needling for low back pain (Review)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 5. Adequacy of acupuncture (Continued) Lehmann 1986 Choice of meridians is OK Adequate Adequate Adequate Sham TENS Leibing 2002 Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Sham acupuncture Li 1997 Adequate Adequate Adequate Not reported Manual acupuncture without cupping. Lopacz 1979 Not reported Adequate Not reported Not reported Placebo: to control for attention effect. MacDonald 1983 Adequate meridian) (not Adequate Adequate for the purpose of the study Not reported Sham TENS. It is easy for patients to perceive that they were receiving different treatments Mendelson 1983 Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Maybe not adequate placebo. May have some analgesic effect. Meng 2003 Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Standard therapy Molsberger 2002 Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Sham acupuncture: good placebo. Sakai 1998 Adequate Adequate for the purpose of the study Not reported Not reported Medication Sakai 2001 Adequate (not meridian) Adequate for the purpose of the study Not reported Not reported TENS: seems adequate. But number of sessions too small. Takeda 2001 Adequate for the purpose of the study Adequate Not reported Not reported Other acupuncture technique: local versus distal points. But there is no description about credibility of sham acupuncture Thomas 1994 Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate No treatment Acupuncture and dry-needling for low back pain (Review) Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 126
Table 5. Adequacy of acupuncture (Continued) Tsukayama 2002 Adequate Adequate for the purpose of the study Adequate Not reported TENS but number of sessions too small. Von 1988 Mencke Adequate Adequate Adequate Not reported Sham acupuncture Wang 1996 Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Active acupuncture: distal points Wu 1991 Adequate (for acute LBP) Adequate (single session for acute LBP) Adequate Adequate Another active acupuncture treatment Yeung 2003 Adequate Adequate for the purpose of the study Adequate Adequate Physiotherapy (standard exercises) Patients in the exercise group did not receive the same attention as in the acupuncture group A P P E N D I C E S Appendix 1. MEDLINE search strategy 1 randomized controlled trial.pt. (72769) 2 controlled clinical trial.pt. (16977) 3 Randomized Controlled Trials/ (17706) 4 Random Allocation/ (11879) 5 Double-Blind Method/ (26902) 6 Single-Blind Method/ (4389) 7 or/1-6 (120640) 8 Animal/ not Human/ (583159) 9 7 not 8 (112795) 10 clinical trial.pt. (144571) 11 exp Clinical Trials/ (45063) 12 ((singl$ or doubl$ or trebl$ or tripl$) adj (mask$ or blind$)).tw. (24652) 13 Placebos/ (4548) 14 placebo$.tw. (30921) 15 random$.tw. (123481) 16 Research Design/ (12824) 17 (latin adj square).tw. (663) 18 (clinic$ adj25 trial$).tw. (43883) 19 or/10-18 (275600) Acupuncture and dry-needling for low back pain (Review) Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 127
Page 1 and 2:
Acupuncture and dry-needling for lo
Page 3 and 4:
Analysis 5.2. Comparison 5 acupunct
Page 5 and 6:
[Intervention Review] Acupuncture a
Page 7 and 8:
traditional meridian acupuncture po
Page 9 and 10:
of experts in acupuncture treatment
Page 11 and 12:
ack pain. The average improvement i
Page 13 and 14:
Figure 2. Acupuncture compared to a
Page 15 and 16:
245 patients who received acupunctu
Page 17 and 18:
Although the conclusions showed som
Page 19 and 20:
R E F E R E N C E S References to s
Page 21 and 22:
Wu 1991 {published data only} Wu YC
Page 23 and 24:
treatments by traditional acupunctu
Page 25 and 26:
Araki 2001 (Continued) Conclusion:
Page 27 and 28:
Ceccherelli 2002 Methods Participan
Page 29 and 30:
Cherkin 2001 (Continued) or acupunc
Page 31 and 32:
Ding 1998 Methods Participants Inte
Page 33 and 34:
Garvey 1989 Methods Participants In
Page 35 and 36:
Giles 1999 Methods Participants Int
Page 37 and 38:
Giles 2003 Methods Participants Int
Page 39 and 40:
Grant 1999 Methods Participants Int
Page 41 and 42:
Gunn 1980 (Continued) varied) Costs
Page 43 and 44:
Inoue 2000 (Continued) Notes Langua
Page 45 and 46:
Kerr 2003 (Continued) For results,
Page 47 and 48:
Kurosu 1979(b) Methods Participants
Page 49 and 50:
Lehmann 1986 (Continued) Conclusion
Page 51 and 52:
Li 1997 (Continued) Interventions O
Page 53 and 54:
MacDonald 1983 (Continued) Language
Page 55 and 56:
Meng 2003 (Continued) 12.7 Conclusi
Page 57 and 58:
Sakai 1998 (Continued) 2) Oral medi
Page 59 and 60:
Takeda 2001 (Continued) Mean age: 2
Page 61 and 62:
Tsukayama 2002 Methods Participants
Page 63 and 64:
Wang 1996 Methods Participants Inte
Page 65 and 66:
Yeung 2003 Methods Participants Int
Page 67 and 68:
(Continued) Kinoshita 1981 Koike 19
Page 69 and 70:
GerAc (Continued) Interventions Out
Page 71 and 72:
Munglani (Continued) Contact inform
Page 73 and 74:
D A T A A N D A N A L Y S E S Compa
Page 75 and 76:
3.1 Short-term follow-up (up to 3 m
Page 77 and 78:
13.1 Immediately after the end of t
Page 79 and 80: 3.2 Short-term follow-up (up to 3 m
Page 81 and 82: 5 physical examination 1 Mean Diffe
Page 83 and 84: Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 acupunct
Page 97 and 98: Analysis 5.10. sick leave Compariso
Page 99 and 100: Analysis 5.14. Comparison 5 acupunc
Page 103 and 104: pain and function (adjusted for bas
Page 105 and 106: Review: Analysis 7.2. Comparison 7
Page 109 and 110: Analysis 10.3. Comparison 10 acupun
Page 113 and 114: improvement (Continued) Li 1997 Imp
Page 121 and 122: Table 2. Methodological quality ass
Page 123 and 124: Table 2. Methodological quality ass
Page 125 and 126: Table 3. Clinical relevance assessm
Page 127 and 128: Table 4. Improvement in pain Compar
Page 129: Table 5. Adequacy of acupuncture (C
Page 133 and 134: 20 factorial$.ti,ab. (2463) 21 foll
Page 135 and 136: (Continued) 30 October 2004 New cit
show all

Acupuncture and dry-needling for low back pain (Review)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?