Acupuncture and dry-needling for low back pain (Review)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

He 1997 (Continued) d) no changes: no significant change. The overall assessment was measured one year after the end of the sessions Costs: not reported Complications: not reported Notes We classified the duration as acute/subacute. We dichotomized at a/b/c versus d. Language: Chinese Publication: full paper No additional information from authors For results, see the comparisons: 2.2 Conclusion: “Manual acupuncture with moxibustion plus Chinese herbal medicine is better (p
Inoue 2000 (Continued) Notes Language: Japanese Publication: abstract We obtained additional information from authors. For results, see the comparisons: 9.1 Conclusion: “There was no difference between real needling and sham needling” Inoue 2001 Methods Participants Interventions Outcomes Notes -Randomized (computer generated numbers). Allocation was done by a centralized office using the Internet. -Patients and outcome assessors were blinded. -Funding: Not reported -Setting: University hospital in Kyoto, Japan. -Written informed consent was obtained. -The Ethics Committee approved this study. -Follow-up: All 21 patients were followed (100%) -Analysis: Mann-Whitney’s U test was used for between group analysis 21 patients with low-back pain of unknown duration who attended the outpatient acupuncture clinic were included Excluded: (1) neurological findings, pain or numbness in lower extremity; (2) malignancy, (3) infection or inflammatory disease; (4) fracture; (5) lumbago due to urological problem, gynaecological problem, digestive problem or cardio-vascular problem; (6) patients who can not stop other conflicting or ongoing treatments; (7) problem of general condition; (8) dementia; (9) pregnancy Mean age: 55.1 years old Gender: no information Working status: no information Previous treatments: no information. 1) Real acupuncture: One needling point was chosen from lumbar area: most painful locus was detected. Needles were inserted and sparrow-picking technique was performed for 20 seconds. One session. Randomized to this group: 10 Experience: not reported 2) Sham acupuncture: One needling point was chosen from lumbar area: most painful locus was detected, same as real acupuncture group. Acupuncturist mimicked needle insertion: tapped head of needle guide tube, then gesture of needling was performed for 20 seconds. One session. Randomized to this group: 11 1) Pain: visual analog scale (VAS) at the most restricted action immediately after the single session Costs: not reported Complications: not reported Language: Japanese Publication: abstract We obtained additional information from authors. For results, see the comparisons: 9.1 Conclusion: “Real needling is superior to sham needling”. Acupuncture and dry-needling for low back pain (Review) Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 39
Page 1 and 2: Acupuncture and dry-needling for lo
Page 3 and 4: Analysis 5.2. Comparison 5 acupunct
Page 5 and 6: [Intervention Review] Acupuncture a
Page 7 and 8: traditional meridian acupuncture po
Page 9 and 10: of experts in acupuncture treatment
Page 11 and 12: ack pain. The average improvement i
Page 13 and 14: Figure 2. Acupuncture compared to a
Page 15 and 16: 245 patients who received acupunctu
Page 17 and 18: Although the conclusions showed som
Page 19 and 20: R E F E R E N C E S References to s
Page 21 and 22: Wu 1991 {published data only} Wu YC
Page 23 and 24: treatments by traditional acupunctu
Page 25 and 26: Araki 2001 (Continued) Conclusion:
Page 27 and 28: Ceccherelli 2002 Methods Participan
Page 29 and 30: Cherkin 2001 (Continued) or acupunc
Page 31 and 32: Ding 1998 Methods Participants Inte
Page 33 and 34: Garvey 1989 Methods Participants In
Page 35 and 36: Giles 1999 Methods Participants Int
Page 37 and 38: Giles 2003 Methods Participants Int
Page 39 and 40: Grant 1999 Methods Participants Int
Page 41: Gunn 1980 (Continued) varied) Costs
Page 45 and 46: Kerr 2003 (Continued) For results,
Page 47 and 48: Kurosu 1979(b) Methods Participants
Page 49 and 50: Lehmann 1986 (Continued) Conclusion
Page 51 and 52: Li 1997 (Continued) Interventions O
Page 53 and 54: MacDonald 1983 (Continued) Language
Page 55 and 56: Meng 2003 (Continued) 12.7 Conclusi
Page 57 and 58: Sakai 1998 (Continued) 2) Oral medi
Page 59 and 60: Takeda 2001 (Continued) Mean age: 2
Page 61 and 62: Tsukayama 2002 Methods Participants
Page 63 and 64: Wang 1996 Methods Participants Inte
Page 65 and 66: Yeung 2003 Methods Participants Int
Page 67 and 68: (Continued) Kinoshita 1981 Koike 19
Page 69 and 70: GerAc (Continued) Interventions Out
Page 71 and 72: Munglani (Continued) Contact inform
Page 73 and 74: D A T A A N D A N A L Y S E S Compa
Page 75 and 76: 3.1 Short-term follow-up (up to 3 m
Page 77 and 78: 13.1 Immediately after the end of t
Page 79 and 80: 3.2 Short-term follow-up (up to 3 m
Page 81 and 82: 5 physical examination 1 Mean Diffe
Page 93 and 94:
Analysis 5.3. Comparison 5 acupunct
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Analysis 5.10. sick leave Compariso
Page 99 and 100:
Analysis 5.14. Comparison 5 acupunc
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
pain and function (adjusted for bas
Page 105 and 106:
Review: Analysis 7.2. Comparison 7
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Analysis 10.3. Comparison 10 acupun
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
improvement (Continued) Li 1997 Imp
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Table 2. Methodological quality ass
Page 123 and 124:
Table 2. Methodological quality ass
Page 125 and 126:
Table 3. Clinical relevance assessm
Page 127 and 128:
Table 4. Improvement in pain Compar
Page 129 and 130:
Table 5. Adequacy of acupuncture (C
Page 131 and 132:
Table 5. Adequacy of acupuncture (C
Page 133 and 134:
20 factorial$.ti,ab. (2463) 21 foll
Page 135 and 136:
(Continued) 30 October 2004 New cit
show all

Acupuncture and dry-needling for low back pain (Review)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?