24.04.2014 Views

a conglomerte bed as a possible lower boundary - Professor Kamal ...

a conglomerte bed as a possible lower boundary - Professor Kamal ...

a conglomerte bed as a possible lower boundary - Professor Kamal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fig (2.22): Occurrence of Chert Nodules in sandy limestone (lime sandstone) in the limestone<br />

succession of Qulqula Formation.................................................................. .......................................<br />

Fig (3.1): Cl<strong>as</strong>sification (Dunham, 1962) for carbonate rocks ............................................................... 40<br />

Fig (3.2): A) Well rounded different lithocl<strong>as</strong>t (dark colour) with biocl<strong>as</strong>ts. B) Different lithocl<strong>as</strong>t<br />

(dark colour) with biocl<strong>as</strong>ts............................................... ............................................... .......................<br />

36<br />

42<br />

Fig (3.3: A) Badly sorted different lithocl<strong>as</strong>t. B) Subangular lithocl<strong>as</strong>ts with foramonifer<strong>as</strong> whole<br />

skeletons............................................... ............................................... ....................................................<br />

Fig (3.4): well rounded different lithocl<strong>as</strong>t and biocl<strong>as</strong>ts showing different degrees of<br />

micritization..Sample 2Dos-15a............................................. ............................................... ..................<br />

Fig (3.5): Well rounded different lithocl<strong>as</strong>t and biocl<strong>as</strong>ts showing different degrees of<br />

micritization. 2Dos-15b........................... ............................................... ...............................................<br />

43<br />

43<br />

43<br />

Fig (3.6): A: Intensely micritized lithocl<strong>as</strong>ts with one longitudinal section of green algae(c) and<br />

superficial ooids(s). B: Badly sorted biocl<strong>as</strong>ts (possibly pelecypods) with lithocl<strong>as</strong>ts.....................<br />

44<br />

Fig (3.7): Longitudinal section of Tetrataxid inflata (Bottom Right) and some other foram cl<strong>as</strong>ts<br />

and lithocl<strong>as</strong>ts............................................................................................................................................<br />

45<br />

Fig (3.8):Some foram cl<strong>as</strong>ts (<strong>as</strong> a colony), lithocl<strong>as</strong>ts and superficial ooids....................................... 45<br />

Fig (3.9): Different origins of peloids (Reijers and Hsu, 1986) which can be applied on the<br />

constituents of limestones of the Qulqula Formation...........................................................................<br />

Fig (3.10): Peloidal grainstone Sample: 2Dos-8a................................ .................................................. 47<br />

Fig (3.11): Peloid gainstone cut by two fracture that are filled with spary calcite............................... 47<br />

Fig (3.12): Peloid Grainstone contains biserial foram at the right side with spary calcite cement<br />

(white).............................................. ............................................... ..........................................................<br />

Fig (3.13): Ooids-peloids grainstone which composed of spherical and oblate (B) superficial<br />

ooids. The oblate voids are formed around biocl<strong>as</strong>ts. Some unknown origin peloids are can be<br />

seen............................................... ............................................... ............................................................<br />

Fig (3.14): Ooids- Peloids grainstone which composed of spherical superficial ooids. with<br />

partially micritized lihocl<strong>as</strong>ts. ............................................... .................................................................<br />

Fig (3.15): Conglomeratic limestone (rudstone) of the P1 at 2km southe<strong>as</strong>t of Harmella Village...... 52<br />

Fig (3.16): Green algal encrustation <strong>as</strong> bindstone facies. ..................................................................... 53<br />

Fig (3.17): Oncoids and green algal by separate encrustation.............................................................. 53<br />

Fig (3.18): A) Lithocl<strong>as</strong>tic-peloidal Grainstone in which the peloidal show some race of<br />

superficial ooids. Type Section, S.N.7a. Peloidal with phosphatic grain.. ............................. ....... ..<br />

Fig (3.19): Mudstone Lithofacies............................................... ............................................................... 54<br />

Fig (3.20): Rip-up Cl<strong>as</strong>ts (Conglomerate) in the P1 2km Southwest of Dostadara Village.<br />

............................................... ............................................... ......................................................................<br />

47<br />

48<br />

50<br />

51<br />

54<br />

56<br />

Fig (3.21): Rip-up Cl<strong>as</strong>ts (<strong>as</strong> Floatstone Facies) in the P1 4Km Northe<strong>as</strong>t of Haji Mamand Village.<br />

..................................................................................................................... ...............................................<br />

Fig. (3.22A) Distribution of the Lithofacies and microfacies in the limestone successions of the<br />

Dostadara section……………………………………………………………………………………………….…<br />

Fig. (3.22B) Distribution of the Lithofacies and microfacies in of the limestone successions of the<br />

Gali, Kaolos Tawella and Type Locality sections( only the digested samples are indicated).<br />

Fig(3.23A): Depositional environment of the limestone successions of the Qulqula Formation <strong>as</strong><br />

a ramp on the Jur<strong>as</strong>sic extension platform (on the half graben). X1, X2, X3, X4, and X5: are<br />

representing the locations of Tawella, Kaolos Dotadara, Gali and Type section<br />

respectively……………………………………………………………………………………………………….<br />

Fig.(3.23B): Possible tectonic setting (extension platform margin) of the upper Jur<strong>as</strong>sic showing<br />

ramp platform on the southwestern side of the Neo-Tethys on which the limestone successions<br />

of Qulqula Formation are deposited……………………………………………………………………….…..<br />

Fig.(3.24): Tectonic and environment of Qulqula Radiolarite Formation with in the tectonic<br />

Senario of Phanerozoic by (Numan, 1997)……………………………………………………………………<br />

Fig (3.25): B<strong>as</strong>inal and tectonic setting of Cretaceous formations in which position of the Qulqula<br />

Formation is indicated <strong>as</strong> equivalent of Balambo Formation. A) (Karim, 2004), B and C) (Taha,<br />

(2008), D) (Ameen, 2008). ............................................... .........................................................................<br />

56<br />

57<br />

58<br />

61<br />

62<br />

62<br />

63<br />

XIII

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!