Employee Meeting - NRC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

58 1 2 a good job at that. So, I think we have reached a good point. And I will let my colleagues comment on that, too. 3 COMMISSIONER OSTENDORFF: I would just 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 add -- and I think most of you all know this -- but I think I applaud Glenn Tracy, and NRO leadership for on their own embarking upon a program to do the lessons learned to date. And I think that has been very important, to take a reflective self-assessment of how things are going. Like the Chairman said, you can't build things without having some problems. That's just a fact of life. COMMISSIONER MAGWOOD: Just briefly, I agree with what others have said on this. I think we have learned a great deal, both on the industry side and on the <strong>NRC</strong> side, about how Part 52 works. And one thing that has become clear is that the expectations on how Part 52 would be implemented were different on the industry side versus on the <strong>NRC</strong> side. I think what we have seen over the last year or so -- and I give Glenn and his team a great deal of credit for this -- is the convergence of those expectations. And those lessons I think will benefit those who follow. So, this has been, I think to some degree, as the Chairman has said, it is to be expected that there would be some differences in these perceptions. I think we have wrestled most of that to the ground. Now I think that, going forward, we are going to have to make sure that the knowledge of what we have learned through these exercises is clearly disseminated, so that the next one in line fully
59 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 benefits from the experience we have already had. COMMISSIONER OSTENDORFF: Let me add one, just one, comparison outside the commercial nuclear industry that is a data point. I'm going to date myself, but I'll do it anyway. In 1980, my second submarine is a new construction submarine, the USS ATLANTA, being built in the Newport News Shipyard. That was, I think, the 23rd or the 24th submarine to be built in the Los Angeles attack submarine class. So, there were 23 predecessors before I got to this submarine. I was a member of the Joint Test Group. Every week I had a meeting with Naval Reactors, with the Shipyard, the Supervisor of Shipbuilding, and with the capital representatives to discuss changes during construction. And this was the 24th, 23rd or 24th submarine being built of the same design. So, just the complexity of detailed issues, it's just a fact of life. CHAIRMAN MACFARLANE: Next question. 18 QUESTIONER: How is the Agency assessing 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 progress and the effectiveness of the Knowledge Management Program, especially given the staff turnover? CHAIRMAN MACFARLANE: I think I'm going to ask Mark to address that one. MR. SATORIUS: Just so I understand the question, was it the question, how do we assess successes within our knowledge management activities? 26 QUESTIONER: Assessing the progress and the
Page 1 and 2:
1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 UNI
Page 3 and 4:
3 1 2 the Commission regarding Agen
Page 5 and 6:
5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Page 7 and 8: 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Page 9 and 10: 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Page 11 and 12: 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 on the Commiss
Page 13 and 14: 13 1 2 3 4 But, that said, I also t
Page 15 and 16: 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Page 17 and 18: 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Page 19 and 20: 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Page 21 and 22: 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Part 61, ve
Page 23 and 24: 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Page 25 and 26: 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Page 27 and 28: 27 1 2 3 4 5 and I'll ask Mark to j
Page 29 and 30: 29 1 2 3 So, unfortunately, the sit
Page 31 and 32: 31 1 2 some non-government organiza
Page 33 and 34: 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Page 35 and 36: 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Page 37 and 38: 37 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 works. I th
Page 39 and 40: 39 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 as Co
Page 41 and 42: 41 1 2 3 4 somewhat of a follow-on
Page 43 and 44: 43 1 2 3 4 5 6 just their overall t
Page 45 and 46: 45 1 answer. I think that a more li
Page 47 and 48: 47 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Page 49 and 50: 49 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 An
Page 51 and 52: 51 1 2 3 4 5 6 challenge internally
Page 53 and 54: 53 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 they
Page 55 and 56: 55 1 2 3 particular application tha
Page 57: 57 1 2 3 4 5 tried to incorporate t
Page 61 and 62: 61 1 2 Okay. Go ahead. QUESTIONER:
Page 63 and 64: 63 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Page 65 and 66: 65 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (Laughter.) I fe
Page 67 and 68: 67 1 2 One of the best things about
Page 69 and 70: 69 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 However,
Page 71: 71 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
show all

Employee Meeting - NRC

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?