Dimensions and Design of swimming pool fences and balcony - ANEC
Dimensions and Design of swimming pool fences and balcony - ANEC
Dimensions and Design of swimming pool fences and balcony - ANEC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
After 150 s, in groups 1 <strong>and</strong> 2, the experimenter<br />
placed 2 boxes (dimensions 30 cm length x 20<br />
cm width x 10 cm height, <strong>and</strong> 30 cm length x 20<br />
cm width x 20 cm height) close to the barrier,<br />
<strong>of</strong>fering additional but not compulsory aid to<br />
cross the barrier. In group 3 the children knew<br />
that the boxes were available <strong>and</strong> could get<br />
them whenever they wanted.<br />
The children were taken to the experiment<br />
apparatus in small groups. The task was<br />
performed by one child at a time. Visual access<br />
to other children’s trials was allowed.<br />
In all conditions the children were filmed from<br />
behind. The video recordings were pasted into<br />
movie fragments for analysis. The following<br />
items were then considered: 1) success/failure<br />
in crossing the barrier (with or without boxes),<br />
2) time to cross the barrier (from the moment<br />
<strong>of</strong> the first contact with the barrier, previous to<br />
the climbing action, until contact with the floor<br />
on the other side, or until the last visible frame<br />
when contact was occluded by the height <strong>of</strong> the<br />
barrier), <strong>and</strong> 3) passing technique (action modes<br />
adopted for transposition).<br />
3.7 Actions modes<br />
The action modes adopted for the crossing <strong>of</strong><br />
the barrier were classified following the criteria<br />
<strong>of</strong> action control <strong>and</strong> safety when transposing<br />
the barrier. It was assumed that when crossing<br />
a barrier with maximum control, children keep<br />
their vertical posture, keeping the head above<br />
the waist. Arms can move easily <strong>and</strong> balance<br />
when transposing the barrier is not greatly<br />
affected. The risk <strong>of</strong> falling is minimal (see Fig.<br />
3). The second action mode is generally used<br />
when the level <strong>of</strong> difficulty <strong>of</strong> the barrier<br />
restrains the amount <strong>of</strong> options. In these<br />
situations vertical balance is sacrificed in favour<br />
<strong>of</strong> a position that <strong>of</strong>fers a greater contact<br />
between the body <strong>and</strong> the barrier. So, the barrier<br />
is crossed with the head <strong>and</strong> waist at the same<br />
level. This technique is more dangerous <strong>and</strong><br />
guarantees less balance than the previous one<br />
(see Fig. 4). The third action mode is the most<br />
dangerous one since it is characterized by<br />
crossing with the head under the waist. In a way<br />
this represents a situation <strong>of</strong> a probable fall (see<br />
Fig. 5). Next, we present some examples <strong>of</strong> the<br />
action modes described.<br />
<strong>Dimensions</strong> <strong>and</strong> design <strong>of</strong> <strong>swimming</strong> <strong>pool</strong> <strong>fences</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>balcony</strong> <strong>and</strong> stairs barreirs to protect children from falling <strong>and</strong> from passing through, bellow or above<br />
45