Dimensions and Design of swimming pool fences and balcony - ANEC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Percentage of crossings 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 4,8 5,3 10,7 6,7 3,6 7,3 4,3 4,2 10,1 5,3 4,3 25,0 32,1 29,3 28,6 89,5 93,3 85,1 91,3 70,8 60,7 63,4 64,3 31-60 s 21-30 s 0-20 s 0% G-3 H-3 I-3 J-3 K-3 L-3 M-3 N-3 Barrier Figure 13 - Percentage of crossings according to different time categories in Group 3. 4.3 Influence of morphological variables In order to determine the influence of morphological variables in the action of crossing the barriers we analysed: i) the relationship between these variables and success in crossing, ii) the relationship between these variables and time to cross. 4.3.1 Relationship between morphological variables and success in crossing different barriers The comparison between the morphological characteristics of the group of children that crossed each barrier versus the group that couldn’t cross was only performed when both groups had at least 20 % of the total sample. For this reason, we excluded from analysis barriers F-2 (which only 10% of the children were able to cross), and G-3 and K-3 (which, respectively, only 16,3% and 4,7% of the children were not able to cross). We also excluded group 1 from analysis due to the small success rate in that group. Data relative to the comparison of different morphological characteristics in children that failed versus children that succeeded in the action of crossing each barrier are shown in Tables 9 to 16. Table 17 summarizes the significant differences found for the barriers analysed in group 3. 62 Faculdade de Motricidade Humana Universidade Técnica de Lisboa
Table 9 - Influence of morphological characteristics in crossing barrier D-2 ( * p
Page 1 and 2:
Dimensions and Design of swimming p
Page 3:
PROJECT TEAM Carlos Neto Faculty of
Page 7 and 8:
CONTENTS 1. PROBLEM 1 Background 3
Page 9 and 10:
FIGURES Fig. 1. 8 A gap of 11 cm al
Page 11 and 12:
TABLES Table 1. 9 Recommended spaci
Page 13 and 14:
1. PROBLEM Dimensions and design of
Page 15 and 16:
1.1 Background Climbing is a natura
Page 17 and 18:
2. LITERATURE RESEARCH Dimensions a
Page 19 and 20:
2.1 Reference values Safety barrier
Page 21 and 22:
The French standard (NF P 01-012),
Page 23 and 24: 2.2 Morphological Characterization
Page 25 and 26: the same bone. This small differenc
Page 27 and 28: will not be the case in older “wa
Page 29 and 30: climbing they can reach new places
Page 31 and 32: Age (years) 7-9 10-14 Climbingbe
Page 33 and 34: y strong children. Even daily activ
Page 35 and 36: and physical characteristics of the
Page 37 and 38: 2.3.7 Risk and risk-taking From a c
Page 39 and 40: show that some context-related vari
Page 41 and 42: perhaps because of poorer precautio
Page 43 and 44: 3. METHODS Dimensions and design of
Page 45 and 46: 3.1 Participants Ninety eight child
Page 47 and 48: Table 3. Description of the barrier
Page 53 and 54: Stature Weight Head Circumference (
Page 55 and 56: 3.5 Standard and reference norms Mo
Page 57 and 58: After 150 s, in groups 1 and 2, the
Page 59 and 60: 3 - HUW - Head under waist - the ch
Page 61 and 62: 4. RESULTS Dimensions and design of
Page 63 and 64: 4.1 Crossing different barriers: su
Page 65 and 66: caregivers should pay special atten
Page 67 and 68: Table 5 - Grouping crossings for 9-
Page 69 and 70: Table 6 - Grouping crossings for 36
Page 71 and 72: equipped with different kinds of ba
Page 73: Percentage of crossings 100% 90% 80
Page 77 and 78: Table 13 - Influence of morphologic
Page 79 and 80: Table 17 - Morphological variables
Page 81 and 82: Table 18 - Correlations between tim
Page 83 and 84: Ratio Strength / Weight 0,50 0,45 0
show all

Dimensions and Design of swimming pool fences and balcony - ANEC

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?