Final Report - Pima Association of Governments
Final Report - Pima Association of Governments
Final Report - Pima Association of Governments
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
High Capacity Transit System Plan - <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2009<br />
Appendix B<br />
HCT-Supportive Component<br />
Do the purposes, goals, and<br />
objectives <strong>of</strong> the General Plan<br />
place importance on the use <strong>of</strong><br />
alternative transportation modes?<br />
Are HCT modes in particular a part<br />
<strong>of</strong> the local government’s vision?<br />
Do the purposes, goals, and<br />
objectives <strong>of</strong> the General Plan<br />
place importance on TOD?<br />
Are there any purposes and goals<br />
that conflict with HCT and TOD?<br />
Are there HCT-supportive land use<br />
designations?<br />
Are densities, intensities, and land<br />
use mix requirements under<br />
existing mixed-use land use<br />
designations HCT-supportive?<br />
Can HCT-supportive land use<br />
designations be applied in the HCT<br />
corridors?<br />
Is housing mix addressed in the<br />
General Plan?<br />
Does the General Plan identify infill<br />
and redevelopment as methods for<br />
increasing densities and improving<br />
land use patterns?<br />
Is coordination with other regional<br />
governments and agencies on HCT<br />
and TOD matters a part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
General Plan?<br />
Table B-5 Town <strong>of</strong> Sahuarita General Plan Review<br />
Yes<br />
No<br />
Maybe<br />
No<br />
Yes<br />
N/A<br />
Yes<br />
Yes<br />
Comments<br />
The Vision Statement recognizes mobility choices. Goal GA-1 states<br />
that the Town will “promote balanced, efficient development to areas<br />
that ... encourage multimodal transportation.” Circulation Goal CIR-1<br />
states that the Town will “improve the mobility <strong>of</strong> people and goods by<br />
providing effective, convenient, accessible, and safe transportation<br />
options....” The Introduction to the Circulation Element also<br />
acknowledges the importance <strong>of</strong> alternative transportation modes.<br />
Express bus, BRT, streetcar, LRT, and commuter rail are not<br />
specifically identified, but Policy ENV-1.7.3 advocates a regional bus<br />
system.<br />
TOD is not expressly mentioned, but components <strong>of</strong> TOD are<br />
discussed. Goal LU-3 and its objectives and policies, for example,<br />
address increased densities in major corridors and mixed-use<br />
development. Some developable areas are identified.<br />
HCT-supportive residential land use designations are Low-Medium<br />
Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and High Density<br />
Residential. HCT-supportive nonresidential land use designations<br />
include Commercial and Mixed Use. Commercial allows high-density<br />
residential. Mixed Use allows Medium Density Residential, High<br />
Density Residential, and various nonresidential uses.<br />
Such requirements are not specified in the General Plan.<br />
The Special Planning Areas map dated October 4, 2002, shows that<br />
these designations have been applied in the Highway 19B corridor.<br />
The General Plan Land Use Map shows these areas as part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
100-year floodplain, however, so HCT stations may have to be located<br />
outside the Highway 19B corridor. A CRT station may have to be<br />
located along a spur line.<br />
Goal LU-4 addresses housing diversity.<br />
Yes Infill is acknowledged in Objectives PSF-2.5 and PSF-2.6.<br />
Yes<br />
Coordination with Sun Tran and the County about transit is part <strong>of</strong><br />
Policy CIR-1.3.1.<br />
• The Land Use Element notes that the Town’s General Plan assumes a higher rate <strong>of</strong><br />
growth than PAG does.<br />
• Like the Commercial land use designation, the Employment land use designation could<br />
allow high‐density residential development.<br />
• A new land use designation such as “TOD District” could be developed if existing land<br />
use designations are determined to be inadequate (which does not appear to be the case).<br />
This should be coordinated on a regional level with other local governments.<br />
• A precedent for TOD joint development is arguably found in Objective GA‐1.4, which<br />
addresses coordination <strong>of</strong> public infrastructure funding with the private sector.<br />
B-9