02.06.2014 Views

Smart Meters - Public Service Commission

Smart Meters - Public Service Commission

Smart Meters - Public Service Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1- The people of Las Vegas were not asked nor was anybody told the facts about<br />

smart meters. NVE did a very low profile introduction campaign bringing the<br />

smart meters into the neighborhoods of Las Vegas very quickly and without prior<br />

installation orientation or allowing choices whether to receive them or not. On<br />

Jan 11, 2012 the PUCN issued an Interim Order for Docket #11-10007 instructing<br />

NVE to “enhance its customer outreach efforts and provide better training to is<br />

installation vendor, Scope <strong>Service</strong>s and NVE employees within 10 days or face<br />

administrative fines pursuant to NRS 703.380<br />

2- The contract DE-OE0000205 for the 138 million NVE received is both from the<br />

DOE (31 USC 6304) and DOD (10 USC 2358) department of defense. Even<br />

though public comments in the form of a properly arranged exhibit was accepted<br />

by the PUCN, no response to why the DOD is a part of this contract has been<br />

received by the public to date.<br />

3- NVE admits the meters do emit RF (Radio Frequency) radiation but they only<br />

claim for 5 seconds a day maximum. Using an RF detection meter the RF 35C-W<br />

I found that they are emitting a much higher frequency of emissions and at least 5<br />

times a minute. That is 7,200 times a day your DNA is being hit by blasts of RF<br />

emissions. As consumers we have a choice whether to use a hands free<br />

telephone, a microwave, a dish TV antenna or Wi-Fi in our homes or businesses.<br />

However, we do not have a choice when it comes to the smart meters and this is<br />

an invasion of privacy, creating a vulnerability to adverse hacking and exposing<br />

us to health risks that we can not protect ourselves against.<br />

4- The National Toxicity report to see if these metes are even safe for humans will<br />

not be complete until 2014 and yet NVE has already installed 650, 000 of these<br />

meters in Southern Nevada and is implementing their rollout in northern Nevada<br />

even as I write this. FCC standards do not exist for chronic long-term exposure to<br />

EMF or from multiple sources, and reported adverse health effects from<br />

electromagnetic pollution include sleep disorders, irritability, short term memory<br />

loss, headaches, anxiety, nausea, DNA breaks, abnormal cell growth, cancer, early<br />

fatigue, etc. Because of untested technology, international scientists,<br />

environmental agencies, advocacy groups and doctors are calling for the use of<br />

caution in wireless technologies.<br />

5- Concerns about the accuracy of smart meters have been raised nationwide,<br />

leading the Maryland <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Service</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> to deny permission on June 21,<br />

2010 for the deployment of smart meters in that state. The state of Hawaii <strong>Public</strong><br />

Utility commission also recently declined to adopt a smart grid system in that<br />

state. The CPUC currently has pending before it a petition from the City and<br />

County of San Francisco, and other municipalities, seeking to delay the<br />

implementation of smart meters until questions about their accuracy can be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!