Smart Meters - Public Service Commission

in humans. [My paper] J R Jauchem
* The 2002 letter from Norbert Hankin of the US Environmental
Protection Agency to Janet New of (then) The EMR Network [she is now head of
the EMR Policy Institute]. [My paper]Norbert Hankin’s revealing letter
indicates standards set by the US government in 1996 do not apply to
non-thermal effects of RF radiation. In other words, we are not living in a
world of protection; the non-thermal effects of RF radiation were not taken
into account when the regulations were established. “Safety standards”
were never set. “Safety” is a false assumption.
3) I made an appointment to see Gunnar Heuser, MD, PhD., in the Los
Angeles area. Dr. Heuser has long specialized in neuro-toxicology and is
widely recognized as an one of the top medical experts in this arena. Dr.
Heuser can objectively test a patient to document electro-sensitivity, and
if they are found to be electro-sensitive, he can write a medial report that
can unequivocally state one’ s health may be harmed by exposure to RF
radiation from a Smart Meter. I fell into this electro-sensitive category,
as have many others. Dr. Heuser is seeing more and more patients adversely
affected by Smart Meters. He can be reached at: (310) 500-0041. Dr. Heuser’ s address:
P. O. Box 2730, Agoura Hills, CA 91376.
4) I then sent letters from my cardiologist and Dr. Heuser to SDG&E’s
corporate office. I told them they could not place a Smart Meter on my home
due to health concerns. Additionally, I stated I would hold SDG&E legally
responsible if my health was further impaired by a Smart Meter.
5) The result? SDG&E did not install a Smart Meter on my home.
Susan Foster
Rancho Santa Fe CA
_________________________
January 4, 2010
emfsafetynetwork.org/?page_id=2292
54/67