Smart Meters - Public Service Commission
Smart Meters - Public Service Commission
Smart Meters - Public Service Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
itical 9/23/12 Problem with ‘<strong>Smart</strong>’ <strong>Meters</strong>: The Switching-Mode Power Supply (SMPS) | eon3EMFblog.net<br />
sandaura says:<br />
May 19, 2011 at 12:34 PM<br />
For more sharing visit http://sandaura.wordpress.com<br />
Stephen Dubovsky says:<br />
July 21, 2011 at 7:01 PM<br />
Try this patent test. Straightewn out an iron coat hanger, bend it into an L shape,<br />
Hold it gently in one hand and support the bottom end with the palm of your hand.<br />
Hold it overhead so that it can spin. Everywhere that I have tried this within 200 feet of<br />
where smart meters are, it rotates readily and rapidly. It may stop and reverse. If I turn off<br />
the main power to a building this no longer happens inside. I have been using this device tofollo underground pipes for over twenty years. This is no longer<br />
possible since smart meters went in, all I get is full continuous rotating sometimes reversin direction. I haven’t measured the torque but it is significant, it<br />
takes considerable planning to achieve that effect in a motor. The wire does it all by itself, with the help of a smart meter in the neighborhood. Also a<br />
good lin filter eliminates it, such as with a filtered battery backup. I’m convinced, used my evidence to find this supporting article.<br />
Mia Nony says:<br />
July 24, 2011 at 12:12 PM<br />
Dear Mary:<br />
Could you please confirm whether the SMPS is also installed as an integral part of the Itron Centron II Openway <strong>Smart</strong> Meter being deployed here in<br />
British Columbia at top speed?<br />
Is there also an SMPS which still operates and risks harm even if the meter is hard wired to the copper wire in phone line?<br />
I am wondering if this potential “option” is only a bait and switch tactic which will not reduce harm., even if considered by B.C. Hydro for those with<br />
medical reasons.<br />
Also?<br />
Health Canada laws use Safety Code Six – (which, please note, is absolutely no different than the same Code used for all countries including the USA,<br />
as these are the international code standards of safety).<br />
International Health Law as well as the version for Canada in Safety Code Six law as good as states that any wireless device with incompatible<br />
frequencies capable of exciting human tissue and causing the “heat effect” are by All Health laws, Canadian ones and those everywhere, “to be avoided”<br />
Think about those implications legally!!<br />
This means that smart meters are right now LLEGA, illegal according to every country’s own health safety laws which state the same thing as Canadian<br />
law everywhere else.<br />
Testimony has been given to our government by a man named Curtis Bennett to this effect and I gather that it has been pointed out to the House of<br />
Commons in Ottawa, Canada in a Standing Committee that Health Canada has “omitted” by “error of omission” this clause of their own laws and Health<br />
Canada has also as good as suspended the use of the weight of evidence of incompatibility of frequencies between biological entities and wireless<br />
devices but that Health Canada only did so for this sole issue of wireless devices.<br />
Busted.<br />
Safety Code Six in Canada states that an SMPS is on every computer as well.<br />
If so, my other question is this: Is the SMPS also constantly creating microbursts up to 50,000 gigahertz from a computer and causing equivalent harm<br />
to the user at close range or otherwise?<br />
Also are you aware that there is a lawsuit in process in the US based on the fact that Health Canada is in violation of its own laws which are no different<br />
than yours regarding excitation and stimulation and resulting heat effect on human tissues from frequency conflict between these devices and the human<br />
body which has a frequency of about 7 to 7.5 hertz and which has absolutely no EMF shielding? Even a simple coaxial cable has shielding! We have<br />
NONE!<br />
James Heddle says:<br />
July 24, 2011 at 2:52 PM<br />
Hi Mia,<br />
You ask good questions. I can only guess, since I’m not an electrical engineer.<br />
eon3emfblog.net/?p=2180<br />
5/11