02.06.2014 Views

Smart Meters - Public Service Commission

Smart Meters - Public Service Commission

Smart Meters - Public Service Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

itical 9/23/12 Problem with ‘<strong>Smart</strong>’ <strong>Meters</strong>: The Switching-Mode Power Supply (SMPS) | eon3EMFblog.net<br />

sandaura says:<br />

May 19, 2011 at 12:34 PM<br />

For more sharing visit http://sandaura.wordpress.com<br />

Stephen Dubovsky says:<br />

July 21, 2011 at 7:01 PM<br />

Try this patent test. Straightewn out an iron coat hanger, bend it into an L shape,<br />

Hold it gently in one hand and support the bottom end with the palm of your hand.<br />

Hold it overhead so that it can spin. Everywhere that I have tried this within 200 feet of<br />

where smart meters are, it rotates readily and rapidly. It may stop and reverse. If I turn off<br />

the main power to a building this no longer happens inside. I have been using this device tofollo underground pipes for over twenty years. This is no longer<br />

possible since smart meters went in, all I get is full continuous rotating sometimes reversin direction. I haven’t measured the torque but it is significant, it<br />

takes considerable planning to achieve that effect in a motor. The wire does it all by itself, with the help of a smart meter in the neighborhood. Also a<br />

good lin filter eliminates it, such as with a filtered battery backup. I’m convinced, used my evidence to find this supporting article.<br />

Mia Nony says:<br />

July 24, 2011 at 12:12 PM<br />

Dear Mary:<br />

Could you please confirm whether the SMPS is also installed as an integral part of the Itron Centron II Openway <strong>Smart</strong> Meter being deployed here in<br />

British Columbia at top speed?<br />

Is there also an SMPS which still operates and risks harm even if the meter is hard wired to the copper wire in phone line?<br />

I am wondering if this potential “option” is only a bait and switch tactic which will not reduce harm., even if considered by B.C. Hydro for those with<br />

medical reasons.<br />

Also?<br />

Health Canada laws use Safety Code Six – (which, please note, is absolutely no different than the same Code used for all countries including the USA,<br />

as these are the international code standards of safety).<br />

International Health Law as well as the version for Canada in Safety Code Six law as good as states that any wireless device with incompatible<br />

frequencies capable of exciting human tissue and causing the “heat effect” are by All Health laws, Canadian ones and those everywhere, “to be avoided”<br />

Think about those implications legally!!<br />

This means that smart meters are right now LLEGA, illegal according to every country’s own health safety laws which state the same thing as Canadian<br />

law everywhere else.<br />

Testimony has been given to our government by a man named Curtis Bennett to this effect and I gather that it has been pointed out to the House of<br />

Commons in Ottawa, Canada in a Standing Committee that Health Canada has “omitted” by “error of omission” this clause of their own laws and Health<br />

Canada has also as good as suspended the use of the weight of evidence of incompatibility of frequencies between biological entities and wireless<br />

devices but that Health Canada only did so for this sole issue of wireless devices.<br />

Busted.<br />

Safety Code Six in Canada states that an SMPS is on every computer as well.<br />

If so, my other question is this: Is the SMPS also constantly creating microbursts up to 50,000 gigahertz from a computer and causing equivalent harm<br />

to the user at close range or otherwise?<br />

Also are you aware that there is a lawsuit in process in the US based on the fact that Health Canada is in violation of its own laws which are no different<br />

than yours regarding excitation and stimulation and resulting heat effect on human tissues from frequency conflict between these devices and the human<br />

body which has a frequency of about 7 to 7.5 hertz and which has absolutely no EMF shielding? Even a simple coaxial cable has shielding! We have<br />

NONE!<br />

James Heddle says:<br />

July 24, 2011 at 2:52 PM<br />

Hi Mia,<br />

You ask good questions. I can only guess, since I’m not an electrical engineer.<br />

eon3emfblog.net/?p=2180<br />

5/11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!