Smart Meters - Public Service Commission

for study, and has not released any study results or findings a decade later.
There are no current, relevant public safety standards for pulsed RF
involving chronic exposure of the public, nor of sensitive populations, nor of
people with metal and medical implants that can be affected both by
localized heating and by electromagnetic interference (EMI) for medical
wireless implanted devices.
Considering that millions of smart meters are slated to be installed on
virtually every electrified building in America, the scope of the question is
large and highly personal. Every family home in the country, and every
school classroom – every building with an electric meter – is to have a new
wireless meter – and thus subject to unpredictable levels of RF every day.
1) Have smart meters been tested and shown to comply with FCC
public safety limits (limits for uncontrolled public access)?
2) Are these FCC public safety limits sufficiently protective of public
health and safety? This question is posed in light of the last thirty
years of international scientific investigation and public health
assessments documenting the existence of bioeffects and adverse
health effects at RF levels far below current FCC standards. The
FCC’s standards have not been updated since 1992, and did not
anticipate nor protect against chronic exposures (as opposed to acute
exposures) from low-intensity or non-thermal RF exposures,
particularly pulsed RF exposures.
3) What demonstration is there that wireless smart meters will comply