02.06.2014 Views

Smart Meters - Public Service Commission

Smart Meters - Public Service Commission

Smart Meters - Public Service Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

It’s precisely why the <strong>Smart</strong> Meter Safety Coalition is kicking off a series of discussions and Q&A<br />

sessions called “<strong>Smart</strong> Choices About <strong>Smart</strong> <strong>Meters</strong>: Crucial Issues to Consider in Making an<br />

Informed Decision.” The first one’s happening June 29 th at 6:30 pm at Scarborough Town Hall. All<br />

are welcome.<br />

Meanwhile, Bath residents who don’t want a wireless meter won’t have to pay $40 up front and $12<br />

per month to keep a piece of equipment they already have.<br />

Or will they?<br />

It seems, in addition to threatening to sue the city, CMP is also threatening to skirt the ordinance by<br />

charging every resident the opt-out fee if they don’t accept a smart meter. So says the letter, which<br />

informs the city that the ordinance is “not in the interest of CMP’s customers in Bath who, as a result<br />

of the Ordinance, will be required to pay the opt-out fees unless they affirmatively ask to have a<br />

smart meter.”<br />

For nearly nine months, the <strong>Smart</strong> Meter Safety Coalition has tried to work with CMP to find<br />

reasonable solutions. At every turn, the company has not only disregarded and disrespected<br />

legitimate customer concerns, but actively sought to dismiss and discredit those concerns. CMP hired<br />

the same firm that represented the tobacco and asbestos industries in cancer cases to try to “prove”<br />

smart meters are safe. When that didn’t work, CMP submitted reams of paperwork to the PUC,<br />

trying to “prove” opt-outs were technically and economically unfeasible. When that didn’t work and<br />

the PUC staff issued a recommendation for opt-outs, CMP filed exceptions to that recommendation,<br />

trying to “prove” why the PUC should not only reject the recommendation of its own staff, but reject<br />

opt-outs altogether.<br />

It didn’t work.<br />

The threatening letter is another hired scare tactic — an attempt to “prove” why the Bath ordinance<br />

wouldn’t hold up in court. Whether it would or it wouldn’t is not the point. Bath councilors have<br />

stepped up and taken a stand to protect residents from the actions of a company with a clear disdain<br />

for its customers.<br />

—SMSC<br />

Filed under: smart meters | Tagged: Bath Somerset, Central Maine Power, <strong>Public</strong> Utilities<br />

<strong>Commission</strong>, <strong>Smart</strong> meter, World Health Organization | Leave a Comment »<br />

Winning Opt-Outs, Setting the Record Straight about<br />

Wireless <strong>Smart</strong> <strong>Meters</strong><br />

Posted on May 18, 2011 by <strong>Smart</strong> Meter Safety Coalition<br />

smartmetersafety.org<br />

4/8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!