19.06.2014 Views

Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan - sacog

Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan - sacog

Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan - sacog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

APPENDIX A—BACKGROUND AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION<br />

A.1 Who <strong>Bicycle</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Walks Now?<br />

The population of the six-county Sacramento region in 2005 was 2,057,000, <strong>and</strong> is expected to grow<br />

to 3,350,000 by 2035. The U.S. Census “journey to work” data in Table 3.1 indicates that in the<br />

Sacramento region 2.2% of commuters walked to work, <strong>and</strong> 2.2% used other means, which includes<br />

bicycling; compared to statewide percentages of 2.9% <strong>and</strong> 1.9% respectively. Table 3.2 shows this<br />

data for each of the six counties in the Sacramento region.<br />

Table A.1<br />

Commuting to Work in California in 2000 13<br />

COMMUTING TO WORK<br />

Sacramento<br />

Region<br />

Total<br />

California<br />

Total % Total %<br />

Workers 16 years <strong>and</strong> over 852,362 100.0% 14,525,322 100.0%<br />

Car, truck, or van -- drove alone 642,403 75.4% 10,432,462 71.8%<br />

Car, truck, or van -- carpooled 116,672 13.7% 2,113,313 14.5%<br />

Public transportation (including taxicab) 22,105 2.6% 736,037 5.1%<br />

Walked 18,432 2.2% 414,581 2.9%<br />

Other means 18,667 2.2% 271,893 1.9%<br />

Worked at home 34,083 4.0% 557,036 3.8%<br />

Mean travel time to work (minutes) 25.8 (X) 27.7 (X)<br />

1DP-3. Profile of Selected Economic Characteristics: 2000 Census<br />

Table A.2<br />

Commuting to Work in the Sacramento Region in 2000 13<br />

COMMUTING TO WORK 3 El Dorado Placer Sacramento Sutter Yolo Yuba<br />

Total % Total % Total % Total % Total % Total %<br />

Workers 16 years <strong>and</strong> over 72,119 100.0% 116,409 100.0% 536,310 100.0% 30,383 100.0% 75,151 100.0% 21,990 100.0%<br />

Car, truck, or van -- drove alone 54,656 75.8% 93,265 80.1% 404,130 75.4% 23,756 78.2% 50,498 67.2% 16,098 73.2%<br />

Car, truck, or van -- carpooled 9,599 13.3% 11,718 10.1% 77,021 14.4% 4,492 14.8% 9,922 13.2% 3,920 17.8%<br />

Public transportation (including taxicab) 1,294 1.8% 1,168 1.0% 16,502 3.1% 193 0.6% 2,799 3.7% 149 0.7%<br />

Walked 1,570 2.2% 1,930 1.7% 10,999 2.1% 571 1.9% 2,833 3.8% 529 2.4%<br />

Other means 785 1.1% 1,437 1.2% 9,368 1.7% 458 1.5% 6,216 8.3% 403 1.8%<br />

Worked at home 4,215 5.8% 6,891 5.9% 18,290 3.4% 913 3.0% 2,883 3.8% 891 4.1%<br />

Mean travel time to work (minutes) 29.7 (X) 27 (X) 25.4 (X) 25.4 (X) 21.2 (X) 26.2 (X)<br />

1DP-3. Profile of Selected Economic Characteristics: 2000 Census<br />

The “journey to work” data is a limited resource because it asks respondents for their primary mode<br />

of travel to work; bicycling or walking can often be a secondary or linked mode of transit. In<br />

addition bicycle or walking trips to schools are not counted, though they usually directly replace<br />

vehicle trips.<br />

Regional <strong>Bicycle</strong>, <strong>Pedestrian</strong>, <strong>and</strong> Trails <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>—Amended June 2011 A-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!