Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan - sacog
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan - sacog
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan - sacog
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• Adequate space for allowing faster traffic to safely pass<br />
• Pleasant environmental surroundings<br />
• Minimal number of stops<br />
For commuter purposes, the cyclist is most likely to place a significant amount of importance on the<br />
first three characteristics mentioned, because they directly affect the energy requirements for making<br />
a trip by bicycle. Lower volumes of motor vehicle traffic <strong>and</strong> adequate space to allow faster traffic<br />
to safely pass are desirable for utilitarian trips, but may be sacrificed for speed <strong>and</strong> directness.<br />
A substantial variation exists in the ages, physical capabilities, <strong>and</strong> riding philosophies of cyclists<br />
currently active in the Sacramento region. This variation results in differences in both the level of<br />
expertise among riders <strong>and</strong> the types of trips they are willing to make. The planning, design, <strong>and</strong><br />
implementation of the bikeway system should serve as much of this varied population as possible.<br />
A.2 Existing Conditions<br />
A.2.1 Physical <strong>and</strong> Urban Setting<br />
The six-county Sacramento region encompasses 6,562 square miles of l<strong>and</strong>; this includes hills,<br />
mountains, rivers, lakes, wetl<strong>and</strong>s, agricultural l<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> open space. While these natural features<br />
enhance the quality of life, the geography of the Sacramento region presents some challenges for<br />
bicycle <strong>and</strong> pedestrian transportation.<br />
The density of activities plays an important role in determining how <strong>and</strong> where we choose to travel.<br />
As l<strong>and</strong> use densities increase, per capita automobile usage <strong>and</strong> trip lengths tend to decrease. People<br />
are more likely to walk or bicycle when they live in mixed-use, high-density neighborhoods. The<br />
more diversity of jobs, retail, <strong>and</strong> services available in a neighborhood, the less need there is for<br />
people to drive out of their neighborhood to access what they need.<br />
A.2.2 <strong>Pedestrian</strong> Facilities<br />
<strong>Pedestrian</strong> facilities include paths, sidewalks, crosswalks, walkways, stairs, ramps, <strong>and</strong> building<br />
entranceways. Sidewalks <strong>and</strong> walkways between homes within residential areas comprise the majority<br />
of pedestrian facilities within most communities in the Sacramento region. Many of the pedestrian<br />
walkways that were once included in subdivisions have been ab<strong>and</strong>oned because of crime or the lack<br />
of connectivity with other pedestrian facilities. 17 The original intent of these walkways may have<br />
been lost over time with the development of subdivisions that do not include pedestrian amenities.<br />
Sidewalks are often included in some roadway improvement projects to help fill sidewalk gaps.<br />
Sidewalk improvements depend on the density of the residential area, <strong>and</strong> may not be required in<br />
some cases, for example, in a one-house-per-acre subdivision. 18 Many residents in the rural portions<br />
of the region prefer to have roadways that reflect a more rural setting, that is, without curbs, gutter,<br />
<strong>and</strong> sidewalks. For that reason sidewalks often are not constructed in rural areas. 19 Regardless of<br />
17 County of Sacramento Department of Transportation, “<strong>Pedestrian</strong> <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> – Draft Existing Conditions<br />
Discussion Paper,” March 10, 2003<br />
18 Ibid<br />
19 Ibid<br />
Regional <strong>Bicycle</strong>, <strong>Pedestrian</strong>, <strong>and</strong> Trails <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Amended June, 2011 A-6