19.06.2014 Views

A Socio-Economic Profile of the Rufiji Floodplain and Delta.

A Socio-Economic Profile of the Rufiji Floodplain and Delta.

A Socio-Economic Profile of the Rufiji Floodplain and Delta.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Socio</strong>-economic pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rufiji</strong> flood plain <strong>and</strong> <strong>Delta</strong> - Vol. 1<br />

The history <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rufiji</strong> District is linked to <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coastal Swahili culture <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> trade links between <strong>the</strong> East African coast <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Persian Gulf countries. As a result <strong>the</strong>re<br />

is merging/link <strong>of</strong> cultures. Even today, <strong>the</strong>re are a few people <strong>of</strong> Arab origin in <strong>the</strong> district.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> a strong Muslim influence, Islam is an integral part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Rufiji</strong> culture guiding<br />

both <strong>the</strong> religious <strong>and</strong> social systems.<br />

Table 3: Population comparisons<br />

Category 1978 census 1988 census % change<br />

Male 64249 74223 15.52<br />

Female 71293 78437 10.02<br />

Total 135542 152660 12.63<br />

Dependency ratio 98.18 105.82<br />

Source: URT (1988) Population census Regional <strong>Pr<strong>of</strong>ile</strong> (COAST) Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics.<br />

A comparison was carried out between <strong>the</strong> 1978 <strong>and</strong> 1988 population census. The results are<br />

summarised in table 3. The results show that <strong>the</strong>re is an increase in population <strong>of</strong> about 12.63% over<br />

<strong>the</strong> period. This gives roughly an annual growth rate <strong>of</strong> 1.3%.<br />

Similarly, <strong>the</strong> dependency ratio changed from 98.18 in 1978 to 105.82 in 1988, implying that <strong>the</strong><br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population that is unable to work (Children below 4 <strong>and</strong> adults above 65) has<br />

increased. This implies more production activities are required in order to meet <strong>the</strong> increasing<br />

population as well as <strong>the</strong> worsening dependency ratio. The dependency ratio may have fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

worsened now, but in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> a recent population census it is difficult to make reliable<br />

projections.<br />

The population census <strong>of</strong> 1988 shows that about 25% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> district live in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Delta</strong><br />

area. According to <strong>the</strong> estimates made by <strong>the</strong> DANIDA (1998) report, about 54.8% <strong>and</strong> 38.4% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Coast region population are in S<strong>of</strong>t-core <strong>and</strong> Hard-core 2 poverty respectively, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>se figures are<br />

above <strong>the</strong> national averages <strong>of</strong> 51.1% <strong>and</strong> 35.9% respectively.<br />

2.4 Sources <strong>of</strong> livelihood strategies<br />

Farmers in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Rufiji</strong> flood plain <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Delta</strong> area have evolved a system <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> use over time that is<br />

well adjusted to <strong>the</strong> uncontrolled <strong>and</strong> unpredictable floods <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Rufiji</strong> River. This l<strong>and</strong> use system is<br />

based on inter-planting <strong>and</strong> rotating rice, maize, beans <strong>and</strong> to a lesser extent cotton. In addition, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

is utilisation <strong>of</strong> available natural resources like fishing in <strong>the</strong> rivers <strong>and</strong> lakes, harvesting <strong>of</strong> wood<br />

(large forests <strong>of</strong> mangrove) <strong>and</strong> non-wood products.<br />

Generally, household incomes in <strong>Rufiji</strong> district consist <strong>of</strong> two main components (Havnevik 1983). The<br />

first component comprises income related to primary <strong>and</strong> secondary productive activities such as<br />

agriculture, forestry, fishing <strong>and</strong> crafts. The second component consists <strong>of</strong> transfers <strong>and</strong> tertiary<br />

incomes such as remittances.<br />

2 S<strong>of</strong>t Core poverty as defined by <strong>the</strong> World Bank is <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> income <strong>of</strong> T.Shs 46,173 <strong>and</strong> Hard Core poverty<br />

is defined at Tshs 31,000 per capita per annum.<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!