19.06.2014 Views

A Socio-Economic Profile of the Rufiji Floodplain and Delta.

A Socio-Economic Profile of the Rufiji Floodplain and Delta.

A Socio-Economic Profile of the Rufiji Floodplain and Delta.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Socio</strong>-economic pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rufiji</strong> flood plain <strong>and</strong> <strong>Delta</strong> - Vol. 1<br />

government <strong>and</strong> estimates puts women attendance in meetings at between 10-25% <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong><br />

participants<br />

There are various organised groups in <strong>the</strong> survey area including production groups, political parties,<br />

development associations <strong>and</strong> football clubs. Islamic religious groups were found to be strong in <strong>the</strong><br />

survey areas. Among <strong>the</strong> frequently mentioned groups are UDP (United Democratic Party), CUF<br />

(Civic United Front), UWT (women group <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Chama Cha Mapinduzi, CCM), Youth group <strong>of</strong><br />

CCM, Mkongo Mloka Development Association (MMDA), Islamic groups <strong>and</strong> CCM. There are<br />

specific days <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> week set aside for community development work.<br />

3.1.3 Tribes population <strong>and</strong> migration patterns<br />

The major ethnic group in <strong>the</strong> survey areas is “W<strong>and</strong>engereko” (67% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> respondents, table 10).<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r tribes are “Wanyagatwa”, “Wangindo” <strong>and</strong> ”Wamatumbi”.<br />

Tribe<br />

Table 10: Percentage distribution <strong>of</strong> respondents by tribe <strong>and</strong> AEZ<br />

Inner <strong>Delta</strong> North <strong>Delta</strong> South North Flood South Flood West<br />

<strong>Delta</strong> (n=26) (n=30) Plain Plain Valley<br />

South<br />

(n=24) (n=13) (n=30)<br />

(n=15)<br />

Inner <strong>Delta</strong><br />

North (n=44)<br />

Total<br />

(n=182)<br />

Percent <strong>of</strong> respondents<br />

Mndengereko 72.7 93.3 38.5 66.7 62.5 84.6 70.0 67.6<br />

Mngindo 13.6 29.2 7.7 3.3 8.2<br />

Mmakonde 2.3 3.3 1.1<br />

Mmatumbi 2.3 6.7 10.0 4.2 7.7 3.3 4.4<br />

Mluguru 3.3 3.3 1.1<br />

Mhehe 2.3 6.7 1.6<br />

Mpogoro 4.5 6.7 2.2<br />

Mnyagatwa 61.5 6.7 9.9<br />

Mgogo 2.3 .5<br />

Mmwera 3.3 .5<br />

Mtupa 3.3 .5<br />

Mnongwa 3.3 .5<br />

Mkutu 4.2 3.3 1.1<br />

Muw<strong>and</strong>a 3.3 0.5<br />

Source Survey data (2000)<br />

In <strong>the</strong> <strong>Delta</strong> North <strong>the</strong>re are more “Wanyagatwa” as compared to “W<strong>and</strong>engereko”. These results<br />

support <strong>the</strong> findings reported in <strong>the</strong> district pr<strong>of</strong>ile (URT District pr<strong>of</strong>ile, 1997). See also section 2.2.<br />

Dependency ratio<br />

Dependency ratio was calculated from survey data as <strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> family members who are<br />

unable to work in <strong>the</strong> farm to <strong>the</strong> members who are actually working on <strong>the</strong> farm. The results are<br />

presented in table 3.6. The result shows that <strong>the</strong> overall dependency ratio in <strong>the</strong> survey area is 138.2%.<br />

This shows that <strong>the</strong>re are more people (38.2%) who depend on o<strong>the</strong>rs as far as agricultural production<br />

is concerned. However <strong>the</strong>re were high variations in dependency ratio within households (St<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

deviation <strong>of</strong> 123.4, Table 3.6). Inner <strong>Delta</strong> south recorded <strong>the</strong> lowest dependency ratio <strong>of</strong> 96.2 that<br />

implies that <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> family members working in <strong>the</strong> farm is greater than those who are not<br />

working in <strong>the</strong> farm by 3.8%. The highest dependency ratio was recorded in <strong>Delta</strong> North (185%, Table<br />

11). The dependency ratio within <strong>the</strong> finer AEZ did not show any significant difference (F= 1.07,<br />

p=0.383).<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!