21.06.2014 Views

Annual Report 2008.pdf - SAMSI

Annual Report 2008.pdf - SAMSI

Annual Report 2008.pdf - SAMSI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Naval Postgraduate School, Department of Operations Research<br />

mcarlyle@nps.edu<br />

Trilevel Optimization of Homeland Defense Problems<br />

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is investing billions of dollars to protect us<br />

from terrorist attacks and their expected damage (i.e., risk). We present prescriptive optimization<br />

models to guide DHS investments in a set of defensive options that as an overall defense strategy<br />

reduces our initial vulnerability to attack, while also equipping us to mitigate damage from an<br />

attack after one happens. Our “Defender-Attacker-Defender risk-minimization model” assumes<br />

that terrorist attackers will observe, and react to, any strategic defensive investment on the scale<br />

required to protect our entire country: (a) the defender invests strategically in interdiction and/or<br />

mitigation<br />

options (for example, by inoculating health-care workers, or stockpiling a mix of emergency<br />

vaccines) (b) the attacker observes those investments and attacks as effectively as possible, and<br />

(c) the defender then optimally deploys the mitigation options that his investments have enabled.<br />

We show with simple numerical examples some of the important insights offered by such<br />

analysis. Our primary goal is prioritizing defensive strategies. Secondarily, we want to elicit<br />

optimal attacker behavior, so we can focus intelligence collection on telltales of the most-likely<br />

and most-lethal attacks.<br />

Yu Cheng<br />

University of Pittsburgh, Department of Statistics and Psychiatry<br />

yucheng95@gmail.com<br />

Association analyses of bivariate competing risks data<br />

While nonparametric analyses of bivariate failure times under independent censoring have been<br />

widely studied, nonparametric analyses of bivariate competing risks data have not been critically<br />

examined. Such analyses are important in familial association studies, where multiple interacting<br />

failure types may violate the independent censoring assumption. We develop nonparametric<br />

estimators for the bivariate cumulative cause-specific hazards function and the bivariate<br />

cumulative incidence function, which are natural analogs of their univariate counterparts and<br />

make no assumptions about the dependence of the risks. The estimators are shown to be<br />

uniformly consistent and to converge weakly to Gaussian processes. They provide the basis for<br />

novel time-dependent<br />

association measures, with the associated inferences yielding tests of cause-specific<br />

independence in clusters. The methodology performs well in simulations with realistic sample<br />

sizes. Its practical utility is illustrated in an analysis of dementia in the Cache County Study,<br />

where the nonparametric methods indicate that mother-child disease associations are strongly<br />

time-varying.<br />

Todd Durham<br />

Inspire Pharmaceuticals<br />

tdurham@inspirepharm.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!