21.06.2014 Views

Annual Report 2008.pdf - SAMSI

Annual Report 2008.pdf - SAMSI

Annual Report 2008.pdf - SAMSI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The extraordinary challenge that the oil industry must face for hydrocarbon exploration requires<br />

the development of leading edge technologies to reconstitute the three-dimensional structure of<br />

the Earth. The use of seismic reflections is one of these essential and strategic methods. The<br />

industry has seen a fantastic leap in the ability to process seismic data and to build an<br />

increasingly accurate image of the Earth’s structure. The pre-stack depth migration technique<br />

(PSDM) is currently the most common method employed for seismic depth imaging. PSDM<br />

methods fall into one of two families, depending on how the solution to the wave equation is<br />

approximated: the asymptotic (infinite frequency) approximation leads to what is known as the<br />

Kirchhoff implementation; finite-frequency techniques are known as Wave Equation methods.<br />

Wave equation migration is a rapidly growing tool for complex structure imaging Compared<br />

with the Kirchhoff migration method the wave-equation migration methods can often produce<br />

more accurate images provided that the velocity field is well defined. Most widely-used wave<br />

equation methods are based on solving the one-way acoustic wave equation. There are many<br />

different methods to numerically solve the one-way wave equation. These methods can be<br />

grouped into three classes: Fourier methods solved in the wave number domain; finite difference<br />

methods (FD) and mixed methods that are a linear combination of spectral and finite-difference<br />

methods. One Way wave Equation Migration can be formulated into two separate methods:<br />

Sinking survey or Double Square (DSR) PSDM and Shot Profile PSDM (SP). The first is<br />

generally written in the mid-point offset domain, the second in the shot domain. Accurate wideangle<br />

extrapolation is essential for prestack depth migration because at least one of the paths<br />

connecting the imaging point to the source or receiver is likely to be at a wide angle, especially<br />

when data are acquired with long offsets.<br />

In TOTAL E&P we have implemented both Common Azimuth Migration (CAM based on<br />

common azimuth approximation of the full DSR) and Shot Profile Migration. Compared to the<br />

reverse time Migration (RTM) , One Way implementation are very fast and very well design for<br />

processing very large surface. But they can have some limitation when imaging very steep dip<br />

reflector or in presence of turning waves.<br />

In this paper we show that reformulating the DSR (CAM) in source-receiver domain and using<br />

optimized Fourier Finite Difference (FFD) of the wide angle extrapolation term of the one Way<br />

propagator both in CAM and SP implementation can improve the final migrated image.<br />

Margaret Cheney<br />

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute<br />

cheney@rpi.edu<br />

“Waveform Design for Radar Detection and Imaging”<br />

This talk discusses the question of what radar waveforms are best for forming images. A number<br />

of different formulations of the question are considered. One formulation leads to a close<br />

connection with iterative time-reversal algorithms; another formulation involves a statistical<br />

treatment of imaging.<br />

Josselin Garnier<br />

Universite de Paris VI

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!