21.06.2014 Views

Annual Report 2008.pdf - SAMSI

Annual Report 2008.pdf - SAMSI

Annual Report 2008.pdf - SAMSI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In the talk we will discuss some models arisen in recent and ongoing research in reliability,<br />

especially in software reliability and degradation caused by cylinders in ships.<br />

Elke Weber<br />

Columbia University, Graduate School of Business<br />

euw2@columbia.edu<br />

Determinants of Risk Taking: The Important Role of Risk Perception<br />

Risk taking is a behavior of significant societal importance and concern. Some individuals (e.g.,<br />

female investors) are seen as taking not enough risk, while others (e.g., male adolescents) are<br />

seen as taking too much risk. Economic models of risky choice attribute all individual and group<br />

differences in risk taking to risk attitude, typically a parameter that influences the type and<br />

degree of curvature of the decision maker’s utility function (e.g., in expected utility theory) or<br />

that determines the risk—return tradeoff in finance models that price risky assets as a function of<br />

their return (expected value) and<br />

their risk (variance). In this talk, I present evidence that risk is not an immutable characteristic<br />

of risky choice alternatives, but a psychological variable that is perceived in different, but<br />

predictable ways by different individuals or groups. While risk taking is determined by both<br />

perception of risk and attitude towards risk, the two constructs are confounded in models that<br />

infer risk attitude from behavior without taking into consideration the decision maker’s<br />

perception of the risk. When unconfounded, many apparent individual differences in risk<br />

attitude can be attributed to differences in<br />

risk perception.<br />

Alyson Wilson<br />

Los Alamos National Laboratory, Statistical Sciences Group<br />

agw@lanl.gov<br />

How DHS Currently Manages Risk<br />

Homeland Security Presidential Directive / HSPD-10: Biodefense for the 21st Century provides<br />

White House guidance on addressing the threat of bioterrorism. In particular, it states the<br />

following: "Another critical element of our biodefense policy is the development of periodic<br />

assessments of the evolving biological weapons threat. First, the United States requires a<br />

continuous, formal process for conducting routine capabilities assessments to guide prioritization<br />

of our on-going investments in biodefense-related<br />

research, development, planning, and preparedness. These assessments will be tailored to meet<br />

the requirements in each of these areas." In response to this requirement, the Department of<br />

Homeland Security (DHS) published the first Biothreat Risk Assessment in 2006. This talk will<br />

outline the risk analysis approach taken by DHS and highlight some of the strengths and<br />

weaknesses of their methodology.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!