25.06.2014 Views

March 2004 - Society for California Archaeology

March 2004 - Society for California Archaeology

March 2004 - Society for California Archaeology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

36<br />

Articles<br />

Enormous quantities of soil would have<br />

needed to be removed and stockpiled and<br />

there would have been excessive heavy<br />

equipment and crew costs involved. It was<br />

decided that the budget could be spent more<br />

efficiently on the remaining city blocks. We<br />

had to be content with demonstrating that<br />

the wall foundations of St. Mary’s were solid,<br />

intact, and deep.<br />

Block 10 (Harrison, Bryant, Third and<br />

Fourth) presented a different challenge.<br />

Located on the edge of the 1850s bay marsh<br />

this block saw the largest excavation area cut<br />

a swathe through the historical remains of<br />

what had been the most densely crowded<br />

19th century housing in the project area.<br />

Below as much as eight feet of landfill, 1906<br />

fire-scarred building foundations survived<br />

along with many privies and two deep wells<br />

that produced the bulk of artifacts recovered<br />

during the project. Innovation was the rule<br />

on this block. Ground penetration radar was<br />

used to attempt to peer through six feet or<br />

more of landfill in advance of excavation. Two ASAs were<br />

selected and a Caltrans crew from Sacramento brought in state<br />

of the art GPR equipment to probe beneath the post-1906<br />

sand and rubble fill near the Third Street edge of Block 10.<br />

Initial results indicated that the fill deposits may have<br />

attenuated and bounced the signal around substantially but<br />

these results are being refined and reanalyzed. Final data will<br />

become available as soon as a Caltrans GPR backlog related<br />

to other construction projects has been cleared.<br />

Based on its location close to the edge of the bay marsh<br />

and on the proximity of a known prehistoric site, Block 10<br />

was considered the most likely to harbor Native American<br />

sites. A layer of shell midden was located at a depth of about<br />

8 ft., about 200 ft. from the 1850s marsh edge close to the<br />

Third Street end of the block. Only about 9 inches thick, it<br />

spread over an area of 25 ft. x 7 ft. and was cut through by a<br />

19 th century brick lined well. It contained dense<br />

accumulations of marine mollusk shells, mammal, bird, and<br />

fish bones, and small quantities of fire-cracked rock,<br />

groundstone, and obsidian and chert debitage. Approximately<br />

three cubes of midden soil were excavated. Given its position<br />

adjacent to the historic period marsh, it is anticipated that the<br />

site will be no more than a few hundred years old. Carbon<br />

dating will help resolve the true age.<br />

In the fall of 2002, the crew moved on to Block 4<br />

(Howard, Folsom, First and Fremont), targeting the Miner’s<br />

Hotel, homes on Fremont Street, and the small, cramped and<br />

overcrowded houses set on 25ft. by 25 ft. lots on narrow<br />

Baldwin Court, which used to run downhill off Folsom.<br />

Located on the shore of Yerba Buena Cove in the 1850s<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e landfilling began, this block developed as a mix of<br />

industrial and residential lots. By the 1880s it was dominated<br />

Figure 2: Excavation of the shell midden which is cut by a brick lined well. The tracked<br />

excavator in the background is placing slide-rail shoring around another well.<br />

by the Golden State Miner’s Iron Works that overshadowed<br />

Baldwin Court. With the pollution associated with that<br />

industry, it can’t have been the healthiest place to live.<br />

Privies began to emerge in unexpectedly high numbers at<br />

about 3 ft. depth along Baldwin Court.<br />

Based on results from this alleyway alone, ‘Life on a San<br />

Francisco Side Street’ could be one of the chapters in the<br />

final report. Privies were also located at the Miner’s Hotel<br />

and on Fremont Street, one of the latter over 6 ft. deep, an<br />

unusual depth <strong>for</strong> a privy when you remember that be<strong>for</strong>e we<br />

find them, they have all been truncated by later<br />

development.<br />

A puzzling feature in the project was connected with<br />

Privy 1326, found on Block 4. Seemingly a typical privy,<br />

when fully excavated it was found to be resting on a rather<br />

elaborate granite base <strong>for</strong> which there was no obvious<br />

explanation. It remains unexplained.<br />

US Coast survey maps from the 1850s and other<br />

documentation indicated that much of Block 4 was filled in<br />

with sand after the Gold Rush. This raised the possibility that<br />

Gold Rush shacks and associated features might have<br />

survived buried deeply on this block. Three trenches were<br />

opened with a backhoe in an attempt to determine where the<br />

old Gold Rush period surface was located. It was possible to<br />

dig in this way to about 15 ft. depth be<strong>for</strong>e the sandy soil<br />

collapsed back into the trench and made further excavation<br />

pointless. There was some indication of a possible earlier<br />

surface at about 14 ft. depth in the trench nearest First Street<br />

but <strong>for</strong> safety reasons it was not possible to enter the trench.<br />

Looking <strong>for</strong> early Gold Rush camps on this block would<br />

require excavating the sand to near mean sea level. This<br />

SCA Newsletter 38(1)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!