08.07.2014 Views

North Northamptonshire Annual Monitoring Report 2010-11

North Northamptonshire Annual Monitoring Report 2010-11

North Northamptonshire Annual Monitoring Report 2010-11

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

61<br />

The review of the NNCSS will provide an opportunity to review the phasing of housing delivery in the light of<br />

prevailing market conditions and low rates of delivery achieved early in the plan period (relative to targets). This is<br />

due to the impact of the economic recession on the housing market and on infrastructure provision, not because<br />

of a shortage of sites for house building – there are currently over 24,000 house plots in <strong>North</strong> <strong>North</strong>amptonshire<br />

with planning permission or resolutions to grant permission. The NNJPU will support the planning authorities in<br />

ensuring that housing developments accord with the NNCSS, including its overall spatial strategy, design quality<br />

and infrastructure requirements. In the meantime, an update of the Strategic Housing Market Assessment will<br />

inform revised NNCSS housing targets and may in the short term enable an interim policy approach to be adopted<br />

by the local planning authorities<br />

The Executive Summary at the beginning of the AMR provides a summary of performance against key indicators.<br />

The picture is mixed and the positives, unclear results and negatives are addressed below, within the framework<br />

set out by the following key questions:<br />

• Overall Spatial Strategy – where is development happening?<br />

• Economy and town centres – is a jobs/homes balance being achieved?<br />

• Housing – are targets being met?<br />

• Environmental quality – is it improving?<br />

• Infrastructure - is investment matching growth?<br />

WHERE IS DEVELOPMENT HAPPENING?<br />

The focus of new development is still very much within the ‘urban core’, with 49% of residential development<br />

taking place at the three Growth Towns and 30% at the smaller towns (including Rushden). This compares to CSS<br />

targets of 66% and 17% respectively; highlighting the issue with deliverability of the major sites in the Growth<br />

Towns and the continued attractiveness of smaller sites in the other towns. Equally, rural development has again<br />

been greater than the CSS target (19% delivered against an <strong>11</strong>% indicative requirement), although this does<br />

include the large site at Little Stanion and some development at Mawsley.<br />

Housing completions on previously developed land made up 45% of all residential development, compared to a<br />

CSS target of at least 30%. Employment floor space on previously developed land made up 62% of all employment<br />

land development, though there is no specific CSS target set.<br />

IS THE JOB/HOMES BALANCE BEING ACHIEVED?<br />

Data is not specifically available for the <strong>2010</strong>-20<strong>11</strong> monitoring year, so instead long term trends have been<br />

examined and the impact of the recession highlighted by figures now available for 2008-<strong>2010</strong>. This shows that<br />

<strong>North</strong> <strong>North</strong>amptonshire as a whole is underperforming and that the recession has exacerbated this, with all<br />

districts losing jobs overall in the 2008-<strong>2010</strong> period.<br />

Strategic Planning for the Districts and Boroughs of Corby, Kettering, Wellingborough & East <strong>North</strong>amptonshire

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!