11.07.2014 Views

FIELD TESTING AND EVALUATION OF DUST DEPOSITION AND ...

FIELD TESTING AND EVALUATION OF DUST DEPOSITION AND ...

FIELD TESTING AND EVALUATION OF DUST DEPOSITION AND ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. MEASUREMENT <strong>OF</strong> DEPOSTION VELOCITY<br />

The goal of this WESTAR-funded, University of Utah subproject was to estimate<br />

the magnitude of particle deposition from vehicle-generated dust clouds downwind of an<br />

unpaved road. In this chapter, we discuss the methods and results of direct measurement<br />

of deposition velocity v d . Measurements were conducted in the “impact zone” (refer<br />

Figure 2-1). The measured values of v d are compared to values previously reported in the<br />

literature and analyzed in the context of the resistance model for deposition.<br />

Two types of surfaces for particle deposition, flat substrates and artificial<br />

vegetation, were analyzed with microscopic and gravimetric techniques. Comparison of<br />

these measurements with prior work suggests that there are challenges to bridging direct<br />

measurements with canopy-wide deposition velocities.<br />

3.1 Methods<br />

All the deposition velocity testing was conducted during April 2002 at Ft. Bliss<br />

TX, on a spur road south of Loyalty Lane at GPS coordinates 13 3 70 544 E, 35 28 119<br />

N. The field experiments were conducted in cooperation with the SERDP-funded<br />

projects CP1190 and CP1191. The site is arid with sparse vegetation cover and exposed<br />

sand. The prevailing winds were from the west and nearly perpendicular to the road.<br />

Road surface samples were collected and size distribution was measured by standard<br />

sieve analysis (refer Table 3-1).<br />

Table 3-1 Cumulative screen analysis for the soils samples collected before and after the sampling<br />

period<br />

Facility & GPS Units/<br />

Sample Site Location<br />

Well Test<br />

Road<br />

13 3 70 544 E<br />

35 28 119 N<br />

DRI/JMV ID Notes Silt %<br />

+ 3/8 + 4 + 20 + 30 + 50 + 100 + 200 - 200<br />

mesh mesh mesh mesh mesh mesh mesh mesh<br />

Heavy sand deposits<br />

K408-1A from previous day’s 7.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.85 0.64 0.36 0.07<br />

windstorm<br />

Well Test<br />

Road<br />

13 3 70 544 E<br />

35 28 119 N<br />

K419-TR-1<br />

After extensive driving<br />

compared to previous 4.1 1.00 0.99 0.98 0.87 0.81 0.59 0.28 0.04<br />

samples<br />

Dust Concentration was measured using a GRIMM (Dust Monitor Series 1.108®,<br />

GRIMM Technologies Inc., Douglasville, GA), which recorded particle-count<br />

concentration for 16 size ranges logging every six seconds. This is an optical instrument<br />

that determines particle size and count by light scattering. The sample inlet was placed<br />

next to the surfaces used for particle deposition sampling. A 2.5 m long PVC tube<br />

connected the inlet to the GRIMM instrument, which was placed with the data-logging<br />

computer in a sealed box. One test was conducted using a different GRIMM that had a<br />

direct sample inlet and that was programmed to report calculated mass. Quality checks<br />

for the GRIMM included an internal calibration cycle and cleaning of sample inlet head.<br />

The data from the GRIMM were used to obtain a particle number size distribution timeaveraged<br />

over the duration of each dust deposition experiment.<br />

3.1.1 Deposition on Flat Substrates<br />

A series of tests was conducted to measure the passive deposition of vehicle<br />

generated dust particles on flat surfaces placed near the road. The technique involved<br />

3-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!