11.07.2014 Views

FIELD TESTING AND EVALUATION OF DUST DEPOSITION AND ...

FIELD TESTING AND EVALUATION OF DUST DEPOSITION AND ...

FIELD TESTING AND EVALUATION OF DUST DEPOSITION AND ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

where the subscript “G” is used to indicate that the dispersion coefficient is defined as in<br />

the Gillette box model with units of m/s. Equation 4-27 is identical to Equation 4-20, and<br />

forms the basis for the Gillette Box model. Note that the gravity resistance has been<br />

included for the transport of material through the top of the box model (i.e. Equation<br />

4-28).<br />

Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL)<br />

F = F(z)<br />

C SL Surface Layer2<br />

r a2<br />

F Box-SL =V da2 [C SL -C Box ]=(1/r a1 ) [C SL2 -C SL1 ]<br />

C Box ∆z<br />

r Surface Layer1<br />

a1 F dep = F QL = F Box-SL1 =V da2 [C Box -C QL ]=(1/r a2 ) [C Box -C QL ]<br />

C QL<br />

Quasi-laminar Layer<br />

F r dep = F Box-SL1 = F QL =V db [C QL -C 0 ]=(1/r b ) [C QL -C 0 ]<br />

b<br />

C 0 = 0<br />

Ground or Vegetative Surface<br />

r c r c assumed = 0 for particles if particle rebound is<br />

negligible<br />

r g<br />

Figure 4-2. Representation of the Gillette Box Model in the context of the resistance model to<br />

transport. The dashed horizontal line effectively divides the resistance r a into two smaller resistances,<br />

r a1 and r a2 . The equations for fluxes in the figure do not include the effect of gravity.<br />

In arriving at Equation 4-27 we have made three assumptions that warrant closer<br />

inspection. First, we have assumed that there is no resistance to deposition at the ground<br />

or vegetative surface (r c =0, C 0 =0). This assumption is frequently invoked for particles<br />

that are 10 µm in diameter or less, and we accept it as being reasonable (Seinfeld and<br />

Pandis, 1999; Raupach et al., 1999). Second, we have assumed that the concentration<br />

profile through the surface layer is sufficiently well-developed that F box-SL is constant<br />

from the box to the top of the surface layer. The validity of this assumption depends on<br />

the atmospheric stability. Under unstable conditions, most of the resistance to<br />

aerodynamic transport resides near the surface (see Figure 4-3). When conditions are<br />

stable, the resistance to transport does not drop off as dramatically with height.<br />

Therefore, assuming that the constant flux layer is instantly well-developed is probably a<br />

reasonable approximation for unstable conditions, less so for neutral conditions, and not<br />

valid for stable conditions.<br />

The magnitude of K G cannot be estimated for a stable atmosphere since r a does<br />

not converge on a maximum value. Under unstable conditions, r a converges on a<br />

maximum value, and we can in principle calculate K G . However, since r a is dependent on<br />

height above ground, we must make an assumption about which height to use. Selection<br />

4-12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!