11.07.2014 Views

Flute acoustics: measurement, modelling and design - School of ...

Flute acoustics: measurement, modelling and design - School of ...

Flute acoustics: measurement, modelling and design - School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

128 CHAPTER 9. APPLICATIONS AND FURTHER DIRECTIONS<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

Tuning (cents)<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

-20<br />

-1 octave<br />

loco<br />

+1 octave<br />

+2 octaves<br />

+ 3 octaves<br />

-30<br />

D4 Eb4 E4 F4 F#4 G4 G#4 A4 Bb4 B4 C5 C#5<br />

Note<br />

Figure 9.1: The predicted tuning <strong>of</strong> the unmodified Pearl modern flute.<br />

due to the C♯ hole are immediately apparent—both C♯5 <strong>and</strong> C♯7 are over 20 cents sharp. Interestingly,<br />

C♯6 is no sharper than its adjacent notes; this was also seen in the played pitch<br />

<strong>measurement</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Chapter 7. On the unmodified flute the C♯ key is 7.0 mm in diameter <strong>and</strong> is<br />

238.4 mm from the embouchure hole.<br />

The following sections describe the effects on tuning <strong>of</strong> simple changes to the s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

model <strong>of</strong> the flute.<br />

9.1.2 An ‘acoustically correct’ C♯ hole<br />

The first change I made was to increase the size <strong>of</strong> the C♯ hole <strong>and</strong> to place it at its ‘acoustically<br />

correct’ position. The advantage <strong>of</strong> this change is that the notes made with this hole have<br />

timbre more similar to other notes in the scale. The hole diameter was changed from 7.0 to<br />

13.2 mm <strong>and</strong> the key diameter was changed from 13.0 to 19.0 mm (these values were chosen<br />

so as to match the properties <strong>of</strong> the next few holes). The height <strong>of</strong> the key above the hole was<br />

changed from 1.9 to 2.4 mm <strong>and</strong> the thickness <strong>of</strong> the key was changed from 3.6 to 4.0 mm (these<br />

are average values for the next few holes). The hole was moved 15 mm down the flute, making<br />

it 253.4 mm from the embouchure hole (at this position the consecutive distances between<br />

the first few holes form a geometric series). The resulting tuning is shown in Figure 9.2. Small<br />

changes in tuning can be seen for notes made with the C♯ hole closed: most notes are flattened,<br />

but the change is at most 4 cents. A few such notes are sharpened, but by no more than 1 cent.<br />

This change is consistent with an increase in the size <strong>of</strong> the cavity formed by the closed C♯ hole.<br />

For notes made with the C♯ hole open, C♯5, C♯6<strong>and</strong>C♯7 are more in tune, although the spread<br />

in tuning between the three notes is nearly 20 cents. The tuning <strong>of</strong> D5 <strong>and</strong> D6 is acceptable, but<br />

E♭5 is over 40 cents sharp <strong>and</strong> D7 is out <strong>of</strong> range. These notes use the C♯ hole as a register hole<br />

<strong>and</strong> for this purpose the hole is too big <strong>and</strong> rather inefficient. The remaining notes that use the<br />

open C♯ hole (G♯6 <strong>and</strong> A6) are within a few cents in tuning compared to the adjacent notes).<br />

D♯5 <strong>and</strong> A6 have low playability compared to adjacent notes—likely due to the inefficiency <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!