11.07.2014 Views

Flute acoustics: measurement, modelling and design - School of ...

Flute acoustics: measurement, modelling and design - School of ...

Flute acoustics: measurement, modelling and design - School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

86 CHAPTER 5. IMPEDANCE SPECTRA OF THE FLUTE AND CLARINET<br />

10 8<br />

10 7<br />

m<br />

s<br />

(Pa<br />

10 6<br />

|Z|<br />

− 3 )<br />

10 5<br />

model<br />

experiment<br />

10 4<br />

0 1 2 3 4<br />

f (kHz)<br />

Figure 5.19: Impedance spectra (experiment <strong>and</strong> model) for the modern flute with all holes<br />

closed <strong>and</strong> with the keypad correction given in (5.4).<br />

have one open hole <strong>and</strong> the remainder closed, <strong>and</strong> thus afford a simple test <strong>of</strong> the capability <strong>of</strong><br />

the waveguide model to account for open holes.<br />

Figure 5.20 compares experiment <strong>and</strong> model for the fingering C♯4 on the modern flute.<br />

This fingering is identical to C4 except that the last hole is open. In Figure 5.20 the open hole<br />

has been modelled using the corrections in §2.2.10 <strong>and</strong> using a radiative load for a pipe with<br />

circular flange <strong>of</strong> width 1.0 mm (2.26). Thus any ‘shading’ <strong>of</strong> the hole by the keypad (<strong>and</strong> consequent<br />

flattening <strong>of</strong> the played note) is not yet modelled. As expected, the impedance extrema<br />

predicted by the model are sharper than measured.<br />

The fingering A4 (diffuse) on a modern flute again has only one open hole, but in contrast<br />

to C♯4 the open hole is followed by an array <strong>of</strong> closed tone holes (being roughly halfway along<br />

the flute) <strong>and</strong> the keypad over the hole is perforated (the key in question is one <strong>of</strong> the six keys<br />

normally covered by the player’s fingers). Figure 5.21 shows the prediction <strong>of</strong> the model without<br />

any shading <strong>of</strong> the hole by the raised keypad. As in Figure 5.20, the predicted impedance<br />

extrema are sharper than those measured.<br />

Empirical fits by Dalmont et al. (2001) (equations (2.30) <strong>and</strong> (2.32)) give the extra length<br />

correction (low frequency limit) associated with a disk (which may be perforated) hanging over<br />

a hole. This equation is expected to be a reasonable approximation to the effect <strong>of</strong> a key on a<br />

flute, although in contrast to the system considered by Dalmont et al. open keys on a flute are<br />

never perpendicular to the hole axis, the surface <strong>of</strong> the key itself is compliant, <strong>and</strong> the components<br />

<strong>of</strong> the flute surrounding the hole <strong>and</strong> key may contribute to a reduction in the solid angle

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!