11.07.2014 Views

Flute acoustics: measurement, modelling and design - School of ...

Flute acoustics: measurement, modelling and design - School of ...

Flute acoustics: measurement, modelling and design - School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 77<br />

the player’s embouchure. The embouchure hole is usually slightly elliptical or oval in crosssection<br />

<strong>and</strong> is tapered so that it is larger in cross-sectional area closer to the bore. The modern<br />

flute measured in this chapter has a headjoint with a bore 168.0 mm long. The tuning slide<br />

section <strong>of</strong> the headjoint is cylindrical, 37.0 mm long with a bore diameter <strong>of</strong> 19.0 mm. The bore<br />

tapers smoothly towards the cork, where the diameter is 16.8 mm. The McGee classical flute<br />

headjoint has a cylindrical bore, 158.5 mm long with a bore diameter <strong>of</strong> 19.0 mm.<br />

Acoustically, the headjoint thus comprises the embouchure hole, an upstream bore section<br />

stopped by the cork <strong>and</strong> a downstream bore section which attaches to the body <strong>of</strong> the flute.<br />

Despite such geometrical simplicity, the headjoint is arguably the most complex section <strong>of</strong> the<br />

flute to model, <strong>and</strong> may require the use <strong>of</strong> empirical parameters for a good fit.<br />

The waveguide model was first tested on a simple T-junction, shown schematically in Figure<br />

5.6 (for details <strong>of</strong> the model implementation, see Chapter 8). The input arm to the junction<br />

was <strong>of</strong> diameter 7.8 mm, equal to the diameter <strong>of</strong> the small bore impedance head. The<br />

T-junction was attached to the impedance head <strong>and</strong> the impedance was measured both with<br />

the output arm open <strong>and</strong> closed. The microphones are thus positioned sufficiently distant from<br />

the junction to measure only plane waves, <strong>and</strong> there is no diameter discontinuity at the reference<br />

plane <strong>of</strong> the impedance head. In a real headjoint there are two diameter discontinuities—<br />

one where the embouchure hole attaches to the impedance head <strong>and</strong> another at the junction<br />

between the embouchure hole chimney <strong>and</strong> the bore <strong>of</strong> the instrument—<strong>and</strong> these discontinuities<br />

are close enough that the evanescent modes at each can interact. This simple T-junction<br />

should be a little easier to model than a real headjoint. The measured impedance spectra along<br />

with the predictions <strong>of</strong> the model are shown in Figures 5.7 <strong>and</strong> 5.8. The prediction <strong>of</strong> the model<br />

is quite good for this simple T-junction, although the attenuation factor at high frequencies<br />

appears to be a little higher than in the model.<br />

The input impedance spectra <strong>of</strong> the modern <strong>and</strong> classical flute headjoints were measured<br />

in order to test <strong>and</strong> refine the model. The headjoints were measured both open to the air <strong>and</strong><br />

closed by a brass stop. The measured spectra for the open headjoints are shown in Figures 5.9<br />

<strong>and</strong> 5.10, along with the predictions <strong>of</strong> the model, using published tone hole length corrections<br />

at the junction with the bore ((2.34), (2.35) <strong>and</strong> (2.39) in Chapter 2). The prediction <strong>of</strong> the model<br />

is quite good at impedance maxima but not at impedance minima (which occur at a higher<br />

frequency <strong>and</strong> are lower in impedance than measured). The model deviates similarly from<br />

experiment for closed headjoints (Figures 5.11 <strong>and</strong> 5.12).<br />

Clearly, the discontinuity created at the input to the instrument by the measuring system<br />

changes the measured input impedance <strong>of</strong> the headjoint. This could in principle be accounted<br />

for using multi-modal theory, although this approach is complicated by the consideration that<br />

higher modes at the inside <strong>and</strong> outside <strong>of</strong> the embouchure hole interact. A simpler approach<br />

was found to be sufficient.<br />

The model deviates from experiment most severely at impedance minima, when flow into<br />

the embouchure hole is greatest. However, the flow does not follow closely the walls <strong>of</strong> the<br />

embouchure hole because <strong>of</strong> the input discontinuity. If the embouchure hole is modelled as<br />

a cone with entry diameter equal to the diameter <strong>of</strong> the impedance head <strong>and</strong> exit diameter as

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!