19.07.2014 Views

Contents - Student subdomain for University of Bath

Contents - Student subdomain for University of Bath

Contents - Student subdomain for University of Bath

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

170 CHAPTER 7. CALCULUS<br />

Proposition 52 If R is any ring, we can make R[x] into a differential ring by<br />

defining r ′ = 0 ∀r ∈ R and x ′ = 1.<br />

Definition 81 In any differential ring, an element α with α ′ = 0 is referred to<br />

as a constant. For any ring R, we write R const <strong>for</strong> the constants <strong>of</strong> R, i.e.<br />

R const = {r ∈ R | r ′ = 0}.<br />

We will use C to stand <strong>for</strong> any appropriate field <strong>of</strong> constants.<br />

We will revisit this definition in section 8.4.<br />

Proposition 53 In any differential field<br />

( ) ′ f<br />

= f ′ g − fg ′<br />

g g 2 . (7.1)<br />

( )<br />

The pro<strong>of</strong> is by differentiating f = g f<br />

g<br />

to get<br />

( ) ( ) ′<br />

f f<br />

f ′ = g ′ + g<br />

g g<br />

and solving <strong>for</strong><br />

(<br />

f<br />

g<br />

) ′.<br />

(7.1) is generally referred to as the quotient rule and can<br />

be given a fairly tedious analytic pro<strong>of</strong> in terms <strong>of</strong> ɛ/δ, but from our present<br />

point <strong>of</strong> view it is an algebraic corollary <strong>of</strong> the product rule. It there<strong>for</strong>e follows<br />

that K(x) can be made into a differential field.<br />

Notation 22 (Fundamental Theorem <strong>of</strong> Calculus) (Indefinite) integration<br />

is the inverse <strong>of</strong> differentiation, i.e.<br />

∫<br />

F = f ⇔ F ′ = f. (7.2)<br />

The reader may be surprised to see a “Fundamental Theorem” reduced to the<br />

status <strong>of</strong> a piece <strong>of</strong> notation, but from the present point <strong>of</strong> view, that is what<br />

it is. We shall return to this point in section 8.3. The reader may also wonder<br />

“where did dx go?”, but x is, from this point <strong>of</strong> view, merely that object such<br />

that x ′ = 1, i.e. x = ∫ 1.<br />

We should also note that we have no choice over the derivative <strong>of</strong> algebraic<br />

expressions 1 .<br />

Proposition 54 Let K be a differential field, and θ be algebraic over K with<br />

p(θ) = 0 <strong>for</strong> some polynomial p = ∑ n<br />

i=0 a iz i ∈ K[z]. Then K(θ) can be made<br />

into a differential field in only one way: by defining<br />

θ ′ = −<br />

∑ n<br />

i=0 a′ i θi<br />

∑ n<br />

i=0 ia . (7.3)<br />

i−1<br />

iθ<br />

In particular, if the coefficients <strong>of</strong> p are all constants, so is θ.<br />

The pro<strong>of</strong> is by <strong>for</strong>mal differentiation <strong>of</strong> p(θ) = 0.<br />

1 It would be more normal to write “algebraic functions” instead <strong>of</strong> “algebraic expressions”,<br />

but <strong>for</strong> reasons described in section 8.1 we reserve ‘function’ <strong>for</strong> specific mappings (e.g. C →<br />

C), and the proposition is a property <strong>of</strong> differentiation applied to <strong>for</strong>mulae.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!