Contents - Student subdomain for University of Bath
Contents - Student subdomain for University of Bath
Contents - Student subdomain for University of Bath
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
178 CHAPTER 7. CALCULUS<br />
(1) Suppose θ is a logarithm <strong>of</strong> η, and φ is an exponential <strong>of</strong> θ. Then<br />
φ ′ = θ ′ φ = η′<br />
η φ,<br />
φ ′<br />
= η′<br />
φ η = θ′ ,<br />
and θ is a logarithm <strong>of</strong> φ, as well as φ being an exponential <strong>of</strong> η.<br />
(2) Suppose now that θ is an exponential <strong>of</strong> η, and φ is a logarithm <strong>of</strong> θ. Then<br />
φ ′ = θ′<br />
θ<br />
= η′ θ<br />
θ = η′ ,<br />
so η and φ differ by a constant. But φ, being a logarithm, is only defined<br />
up to a constant.<br />
(1)+(2) These can be summarised by saying that, up to constants, log and<br />
exp are inverses <strong>of</strong> each other.<br />
Definition 83 Let K be a field <strong>of</strong> expressions. An overfield K(θ 1 , . . . , θ n ) <strong>of</strong><br />
K is called a field <strong>of</strong> elementary expressions over K if every θ i is an elementary<br />
generator over K(θ 1 , . . . , θ i−1 ). A expression is elementary over K if it belongs<br />
to a field <strong>of</strong> elementary expressions over K.<br />
If K is omitted, we understand C(x): the field <strong>of</strong> rational expressions.<br />
For example, the expression exp(exp x) can be written as elementary over K =<br />
Q(x) by writing it as θ 2 ∈ K(θ 1 , θ 2 ) where θ ′ 1 = θ 1 , so θ 1 is elementary over K,<br />
and θ ′ 2 = θ ′ 1θ 2 , and so θ 2 is elementary over K(θ 1 ).<br />
Observation 13 Other functions can be written this way as well. For example,<br />
if θ ′ = iθ (where i 2 = −1), then( φ = 1 2i<br />
(θ − 1/θ) is a suitable model <strong>for</strong> sin(x),<br />
as in the traditional sin x = 1 2i e ix − e −ix) . Note that φ ′′ = −φ, as we would<br />
hope.<br />
From this point <strong>of</strong> view, the problem <strong>of</strong> integration, at least <strong>of</strong> elementary<br />
expressions, can be seen as an exercise in the following paradigm.<br />
Algorithm 32 (Integration Paradigm)<br />
Input: an elementary expression f in x<br />
Output: An elementary g with g ′ = f, or failure<br />
Find fields C <strong>of</strong> constants, L <strong>of</strong> elementary expressions over C(x) with f ∈ L<br />
if this fails<br />
then error "integral not elementary"<br />
Find an elementary overfield M <strong>of</strong> L, and g ∈ M with g ′ = f<br />
if this fails<br />
then error "integral not elementary"<br />
else return g<br />
so