19.07.2014 Views

Contents - Student subdomain for University of Bath

Contents - Student subdomain for University of Bath

Contents - Student subdomain for University of Bath

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

92 CHAPTER 3. POLYNOMIAL EQUATIONS<br />

• each primary component is simple or <strong>of</strong> local dimension 1.<br />

Furthermore ([BMMT94, ) Lemma 2], such a rotation need only be 1-generic, i.e.<br />

1 v<br />

have matrix <strong>for</strong> some generic vector v.<br />

0 I<br />

Their paper generalises this to ideals <strong>of</strong> higher dimension, but the complexity<br />

in notation is not worth it <strong>for</strong> our purposes.<br />

A word <strong>of</strong> warning is in order here. The Shape Lemma is a powerful theoretical<br />

tool, but its application can be costly. Consider example 2 (page 86):<br />

G = {x 2 − 1, y 2 − 1, (x − 1)(y − 1)}. This is certainly not a shape basis, since it<br />

has more polynomials than indeterminates. This is inevitable, since the variety<br />

is not equiprojectable (see Definition 58 below) onto either x or y. If we write<br />

s = x + y, t = x − y, then the basis becomes {−4 t + t 3 , −4 + t 2 + 2 s} <strong>for</strong> the<br />

ordering 13 s > t, which is a shape basis. However, consider the similar basis<br />

G ′ = {x 2n −1, y 2n −1, (x n −1)(y n −1)}. Similar rotations will work, but t is now<br />

the root <strong>of</strong> a polynomial <strong>of</strong> degree 3n 2 with at least 3n + 1 nonzero coefficients,<br />

and quite large ones at that, e.g. <strong>for</strong> n = 3<br />

{<br />

8469703983104 − 1328571568128 t 3 + 56109155544 t 6 − 3387236203 t 9<br />

+149161506 t 12 − 11557977 t 15 + 279604 t 18 − 1053 t 21 − 78 t 24 + t 27 ,<br />

−586877251095044672 t + 11229793345003520 t 4 − 363020550569195 t 7<br />

+24557528419410 t 10 − 3328382464425 t 13 + 88786830300 t 16 − 417476125 t 19<br />

−23303630 t 22 + 307217 t 25 + 259287804304663680 s } .<br />

3.3.10 The Hilbert function<br />

Let I be any ideal (other than the whole ring) <strong>of</strong> k[x 1 , . . . , x n ]. Let A be the<br />

algebra k[x 1 , . . . , x n ]/I, i.e. the set <strong>of</strong> all polynomials under the equivalence<br />

relation f ≡ g if there is an h ∈ I with f = g + h.<br />

Proposition 36 If G is a Gröbner base <strong>for</strong> I, then A is generated, as a k-<br />

vector space, by M := {m monomial ∈ k[x 1 , . . . , x n ]|m ∗ → G m}, i.e. the set <strong>of</strong><br />

irreducible monomials.<br />

We have already seen (Proposition 32) that the variety corresponding to I is<br />

zero-dimensional if, and only if, M is finite. In this case, |M| is the number <strong>of</strong><br />

solutions (counted with multiplicity).<br />

The Hilbert function is a way <strong>of</strong> measuring M when it is infinite.<br />

Definition 52 Let A l be the subset <strong>of</strong> A where there is a representative polynomial<br />

<strong>of</strong> total degree ≤ l. A l is a finite-dimension vector space over k. Let H I<br />

be the function N → N defined by<br />

H I (l) = dim k A l . (3.34)<br />

13 But not <strong>for</strong> t > s, since s defines the other line, besides the x and y axes, going through<br />

two <strong>of</strong> the points.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!