92 Table 3. Number of Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Fur Seals By Age Entangled in Marine Debris Collected in <strong>the</strong> Western North Pacific <strong>and</strong> Okhotsk Sea <strong>from</strong> 1971-1987 <strong>and</strong> 1993.
93 Teas, Wendy G. <strong>and</strong> Wayne N. Witzell Impacts of Anthropogenic Debris on Marine Turtles in <strong>the</strong> Western North Atlantic Ocean Sou<strong>the</strong>ast Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, Miami, Florida, USA Abstract Impacts on marine turtles due to entanglement <strong>and</strong> debris ingestion have been documented by Sea Turtle Str<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> Salvage Network (STSSN) participants via observation <strong>and</strong>/or necropsy of str<strong>and</strong>ed specimens. Data compiled by <strong>the</strong> STSSN <strong>from</strong> 1980 through 1992 have been analyzed in an effort to quantify <strong>the</strong> adverse effects of anthropogenic debris on marine turtles in <strong>the</strong> western North Atlantic Ocean. All five species inhabiting <strong>the</strong> data collection area were shown to be affected. Impacts varied based on species, size class, geographic region <strong>and</strong> season. Introduction The data used-in this analysis were collected by <strong>the</strong> National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Sea Turtle Str<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> Salvage Network (STSSN). This network was established in 1980 to document marine turtle str<strong>and</strong>ings along <strong>the</strong> U.S. Atlantic <strong>and</strong> Gulf of Mexico coasts, Puerto Rico <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S. Virgin Isl<strong>and</strong>s. Data are collected by volunteers who document str<strong>and</strong>ing events in <strong>the</strong>ir respective areas <strong>and</strong> contribute those data to a centralized database located at <strong>the</strong> NMFS Miami Laboratory. Data collected by <strong>the</strong> STSSN are useful in documenting <strong>the</strong> impacts of anthropogenic debris on marine turtles; however, care must be taken when interpreting <strong>the</strong>se data. Str<strong>and</strong>ing coverage has varied both temporally <strong>and</strong> spatially <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> quality of <strong>the</strong> data has increased as observers gain experience. These data, <strong>the</strong>refore, represent a sample of sea turtles affected by marine debris. Results Network members examined 676 marine turtles affected by anthropogenic debris <strong>from</strong> 1980 through 1992 - 260 loggerheads (Caretta caretta), 208 greens (Chelonia mydas), 83 lea<strong>the</strong>rbacks (Dermochelys coriacea), 75 hawksbills (Eretmochelys imbricata), 35 Kemp's ridleys (Lenidochelys kempii) <strong>and</strong> 15 turtles which were not identified to species.. Geographically, 243 turtles were documented in <strong>the</strong> Gulf of Mexico, 332 in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>ast U. S. Atlantic, 81 in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>ast U.S. Atlantic <strong>and</strong> 20 in <strong>the</strong> U.S. Caribbean. A total of 182 turtles were entangled in monofilament line, 74 were entangled in fish net material, 114 were entangled in trap lines or rope <strong>and</strong> 46 were entangled in non-fishing gear debris. Non-fishing gear debris included plastic fiber "onion" sacks, burlap bags, plastic bags, plastic six-pack yokes, packing twine, steel cable, aluminum beach chairs <strong>and</strong> various o<strong>the</strong>r materials. A total of 103 turtles ingested plastic pieces or balloons <strong>and</strong> 94 turtles ingested monofilament line <strong>and</strong>/or fish hooks. A total of 118 turtles were affected by tar <strong>and</strong>/or oil.
- Page 1 and 2:
NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC
- Page 3 and 4:
NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC
- Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Special thanks to
- Page 7 and 8:
INTRODUCTION During the early 1970s
- Page 9 and 10:
Sunday. May 8 Monday. May 9 3 PROGR
- Page 11 and 12:
5 0930-1000 - J.E. Winston, M.R. Gr
- Page 13 and 14:
Thursday, May 12 1330 - 1330-1345 -
- Page 15 and 16:
1100-1145 - Session IV: Working Gro
- Page 17 and 18:
13 SESSION I POSTERS Amounts, Types
- Page 19 and 20:
this might imply the early success
- Page 21 and 22:
17 set is made, information on the
- Page 23 and 24:
19 of the Mackinac Straits in north
- Page 25 and 26:
21 "What sample size and sampling f
- Page 27 and 28:
23 demarcations for the seasons (Ma
- Page 29 and 30:
25 Tsubata, Hideki and Masahiro Mor
- Page 31 and 32:
27 little understood. Most stranded
- Page 33 and 34:
Baba, Norihisa 29 SESSION II POSTER
- Page 35 and 36:
Cliff, Geremy, Sheldon Dudley and P
- Page 37 and 38:
Matsumura, Satsuki, Norihisa Baba,
- Page 39 and 40: 35 pellet. The only drawback with s
- Page 41 and 42: 37/38 contained little except plast
- Page 43 and 44: Topping, Paul 40 National Marine Pl
- Page 45 and 46: Adcock, Walter 43 SESSION IV POSTER
- Page 47 and 48: 45 Bortman, Marci L. and R. Lawrenc
- Page 49 and 50: 47 international pilot in 1988, the
- Page 51 and 52: 49 were predominantly present as sm
- Page 53 and 54: 51 translate this awareness into ef
- Page 55 and 56: 53 sources include commercial fishi
- Page 57 and 58: 55 The four year survey was designe
- Page 59 and 60: Snyder, John Techniques for Prevent
- Page 61 and 62: These facts underscore the need for
- Page 63 and 64: Zilligen, Jil and Barbara Miller Sa
- Page 65 and 66: Bruner, Ronald 64 Eliminating Plast
- Page 67 and 68: 66 gained during this USEPA funded
- Page 69 and 70: 69 SESSION VI POSTERS Sources of Ma
- Page 71 and 72: 71 limits during the Soviet Union e
- Page 73 and 74: O'Hara, Kathy Marine Debris Outreac
- Page 75 and 76: POSTER MANUSCRIPTS THIRD INTERNATIO
- Page 77 and 78: 78 Materials and Methods We conduct
- Page 79 and 80: 80 accumulation place of marine deb
- Page 81 and 82: Table 1. Outline of sighting survey
- Page 83 and 84: Baba, Norihisa 85 SESSION II POSTER
- Page 85 and 86: 87 Characteristics of entangled fur
- Page 87 and 88: 89 Scheffer,V.B. 1950: Growth layer
- Page 89: 91 Table 2. Biological Data of Fur
- Page 93 and 94: Plotkin, P. and A. F. Amos. 1988. E
- Page 95 and 96: Mr. William Bailey, Program Manager
- Page 97 and 98: Mr. Diego Diaz-Martin, Biologist FU
- Page 99 and 100: Ms. Dana Kubinski Researcher, Litte
- Page 101 and 102: Mr. Rodney Paterson, SNR Advisor En
- Page 103 and 104: Ms. Anne Smrcina, Education- Coordi
- Page 105: 108 Mr. Steve Wise 110 Crest Ann Ar