mixed - Stata
mixed - Stata
mixed - Stata
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>mixed</strong> — Multilevel <strong>mixed</strong>-effects linear regression 31<br />
Random-effects Parameters Estimate Std. Err. [95% Conf. Interval]<br />
mare: Identity<br />
Residual: AR(2)<br />
var(_cons) 7.092439 4.401937 2.101337 23.93843<br />
phi1 .5386104 .0624899 .4161325 .6610883<br />
phi2 .144671 .0632041 .0207933 .2685488<br />
var(e) 14.25104 2.435238 10.19512 19.92054<br />
LR test vs. linear regression: chi2(3) = 251.67 Prob > chi2 = 0.0000<br />
Note: LR test is conservative and provided only for reference.<br />
We picked an order of 2 as a guess, but we could have used LR tests of competing AR models to<br />
determine the optimal order, because models of smaller order are nested within those of larger order.<br />
Example 9<br />
Fitzmaurice, Laird, and Ware (2011, chap. 7) analyzed data on 37 subjects who participated in an<br />
exercise therapy trial.<br />
. use http://www.stata-press.com/data/r13/exercise<br />
(Exercise Therapy Trial)<br />
. describe<br />
Contains data from http://www.stata-press.com/data/r13/exercise.dta<br />
obs: 259 Exercise Therapy Trial<br />
vars: 4 24 Jun 2012 18:35<br />
size: 1,036 (_dta has notes)<br />
storage display value<br />
variable name type format label variable label<br />
id byte %9.0g Person ID<br />
day byte %9.0g Day of measurement<br />
program byte %9.0g 1 = reps increase; 2 = weights<br />
increase<br />
strength byte %9.0g Strength measurement<br />
Sorted by: id day<br />
Subjects (variable id) were placed on either an increased-repetition regimen (program==1) or a program<br />
that kept the repetitions constant but increased weight (program==2). Muscle-strength measurements<br />
(variable strength) were taken at baseline (day==0) and then every two days over the next twelve<br />
days.<br />
Following Fitzmaurice, Laird, and Ware (2011, chap. 7), and to demonstrate fitting residual-error<br />
structures to data collected at uneven time points, we confine our analysis to those data collected at<br />
baseline and at days 4, 6, 8, and 12. We fit a full two-way factorial model of strength on program<br />
and day, with an unstructured residual-error covariance matrix over those repeated measurements<br />
taken on the same subject: