mixed - Stata
mixed - Stata
mixed - Stata
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>mixed</strong> — Multilevel <strong>mixed</strong>-effects linear regression 47<br />
Obtaining a joint variance–covariance matrix for the estimated {α, log(σ ɛ )} requires the evaluation<br />
of the log likelihood (or log-restricted likelihood) with only β profiled out. For ML, we have<br />
L ∗ {α, log(σ ɛ )} = L{∆(α, σɛ 2 ), σɛ 2 }<br />
= − n 2 log(2πσ2 ɛ ) − ||c 1|| 2 M∑<br />
+ log<br />
det(∆)<br />
∣det(R 11j ) ∣<br />
with the analogous expression for REML.<br />
The variance–covariance matrix of ̂β is estimated as<br />
̂Var(̂β) = ̂σ<br />
2<br />
ɛ R −1<br />
00<br />
2σ 2 ɛ<br />
( )<br />
R<br />
−1 ′<br />
00<br />
but this does not mean that ̂Var(̂β) is identical under both ML and REML because R00 depends on<br />
∆. Because ̂β is asymptotically uncorrelated with {̂α, log(̂σɛ )}, the covariance of ̂β with the other<br />
estimated parameters is treated as 0.<br />
Parameter estimates are stored in e(b) as {̂β, ̂α, log(̂σɛ )}, with the corresponding (block-diagonal)<br />
variance–covariance matrix stored in e(V). Parameter estimates can be displayed in this metric by<br />
specifying the estmetric option. However, in <strong>mixed</strong> output, variance components are most often<br />
displayed either as variances and covariances or as standard deviations and correlations.<br />
EM iterations are derived by considering the u j in (2) as missing data. Here we describe the<br />
procedure for maximizing the log likelihood via EM; the procedure for maximizing the restricted log<br />
likelihood is similar. The log likelihood for the full data (y, u) is<br />
L F (β, Σ, σ 2 ɛ ) =<br />
j=1<br />
M∑ {<br />
log f1 (y j |u j , β, σɛ 2 ) + log f 2 (u j |Σ) }<br />
j=1<br />
where f 1 (·) is the density function for multivariate normal with mean X j β + Z j u j and variance<br />
σɛ 2 I nj , and f 2 (·) is the density for multivariate normal with mean 0 and q × q covariance matrix<br />
Σ. As before, we can profile β and σɛ 2 out of the optimization, yielding the following EM iterative<br />
procedure:<br />
1. For the current iterated value of Σ (t) , fix ̂β = ̂β(Σ (t) ) and ̂σ 2 ɛ = ̂σ 2 ɛ (Σ (t) ) according to (12).<br />
2. Expectation step: Calculate<br />
{<br />
}<br />
D(Σ) ≡ E L F (̂β, Σ, ̂σ<br />
2<br />
ɛ )|y<br />
= C − M 2 log det (Σ) − 1 2<br />
M∑<br />
E ( u ′ j Σ−1 u j |y )<br />
where C is a constant that does not depend on Σ, and the expected value of the quadratic form<br />
u ′ j Σ−1 u j is taken with respect to the conditional density f(u j |y, ̂β, Σ (t) , ̂σ 2 ɛ ).<br />
3. Maximization step: Maximize D(Σ) to produce Σ (t+1) .<br />
j=1