29.07.2014 Views

Royal Rouge Trail Erosion Control Project - Toronto and Region ...

Royal Rouge Trail Erosion Control Project - Toronto and Region ...

Royal Rouge Trail Erosion Control Project - Toronto and Region ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2. Concept 2 – Extended Retaining Wall <strong>and</strong> Trimming<br />

These options were formally reviewed <strong>and</strong> discussed by the Community Liaison Committee<br />

(CLC) at Meeting #1, held on the evening of June 18 th , 2009 at the Tall Pines Community<br />

Centre located at 64 Ryl<strong>and</strong>er Boulevard in <strong>Toronto</strong>, Ontario. A description <strong>and</strong> evaluation of<br />

the preliminary alternatives follows. The evaluation includes an examination of the types <strong>and</strong><br />

extents of impacts, both positive <strong>and</strong> negative, of each alternative.<br />

4.1.1 “Do Nothing” Alternative<br />

The “do nothing” option is a m<strong>and</strong>atory alternative that must be considered in the Class EA<br />

process, as it is used to justify the need to undertake a remedial flood or erosion control<br />

project. Should the “do nothing” option, or other Conservation Authority programs such as<br />

l<strong>and</strong> acquisition be deemed to be a more acceptable solution, then there is no further<br />

consideration for remedial action <strong>and</strong> the Class EA process terminates.<br />

Under the “do-nothing” alternative recession is expected to continue until the slope reaches a<br />

stable inclination, referred to as the long-term stable slope crest (LTSSC), which would result<br />

in loss of a significant portion of the existing tablel<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> an additional amount, including<br />

two existing swimming pools, being placed within the erosion hazard limit. In general, the<br />

recession rate was calculated to be approximately 0.18 metres per year. The following table<br />

provides an estimate of the projected length <strong>and</strong> time it will take for each of the properties to<br />

recede to the LTSSC:<br />

Table 12. Estimate of Time to Long-Term Stable Slope Crest.<br />

Lot No.<br />

Total <strong>Project</strong>ed Crest Loss (m)<br />

Time Estimated to<br />

LTSSC<br />

LTSSC<br />

LTSSC (years)<br />

(Vegetated Slope) (Bare Slope)<br />

30 4 7 20 to 40<br />

32 4 7 20 to 40<br />

34 4 7 20 to 40<br />

36 5 8 15 to 20<br />

38 2 5 10 to 25<br />

40 5 8 30 to 45<br />

42 3 5 15 to 25<br />

44 6 9 30 to 50<br />

46 9 11 5 to 15<br />

48 9 11 5 to 15<br />

Source: Terraprobe, 2008.<br />

Figure 18 shows the anticipated position of the slope crest in 100 years, based on an<br />

average annual recession rate of 0.18 m / yr away from the instability of the valley wall. It<br />

should be noted that the planning horizon for the do-nothing scenario is 100 years.<br />

51<br />

<strong>Project</strong> Plan<br />

<strong>Toronto</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Region</strong> Conservation Authority<br />

<strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Rouge</strong> <strong>Trail</strong> <strong>Erosion</strong> <strong>Control</strong> <strong>Project</strong> January 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!