30.08.2014 Views

Observational Constraints on The Evolution of Dust in ...

Observational Constraints on The Evolution of Dust in ...

Observational Constraints on The Evolution of Dust in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Evoluti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dust</strong> <strong>in</strong> Protoplanetary Disks 97<br />

Figure 4.13 – Comparis<strong>on</strong> between the clustered (dot-dashed black l<strong>in</strong>e) and field populati<strong>on</strong>s (solid<br />

dark gray l<strong>in</strong>e) <strong>of</strong> Serpens, with data from the c2d IRS program (dashed light gray l<strong>in</strong>e, Ol<strong>of</strong>ss<strong>on</strong> et<br />

al. 2009). In the left panel, the flux ratio between 30 and 13 µm (F 30 /F 13 ) is an <strong>in</strong>dicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

disk geometry. <strong>The</strong> middle and right panels show the strength <strong>of</strong> the silicate features at 10 and 20<br />

µm, respectively. (A color versi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> this figure is available <strong>in</strong> the <strong>on</strong>l<strong>in</strong>e journal)<br />

IRS spectra. In the left panel, the flux ratio between 30 and 13 µm (F 30 /F 13 ) is an<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> disk geometry. <strong>The</strong> middle and right panels show the peak <strong>in</strong>tensity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the silicate features at 10 and 20 µm, respectively. For all three quantities, the<br />

two populati<strong>on</strong>s (cluster and field) are statistically <strong>in</strong>dist<strong>in</strong>guishable. A two sample<br />

Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (KS test) was performed for each quantity and the results<br />

show that the null hypothesis that the two distributi<strong>on</strong>s come from the same parent<br />

populati<strong>on</strong> cannot be rejected to any significance (18%, 13%, and 79% for F 30 /F 13 ,<br />

S 10µm<br />

peak<br />

, and S20µm<br />

peak , respectively).<br />

Differences between the cluster versus field populati<strong>on</strong>s will be further <strong>in</strong>vestigated<br />

with ancillary data (e.g., relative stellar ages and masses) and model<strong>in</strong>g (e.g., disk<br />

sizes). However, the IRS spectra allow the c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> that no significant differences<br />

are found for disk geometry or the gra<strong>in</strong> size distributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> the upper layers <strong>of</strong><br />

circumstellar disks <strong>in</strong> clustered compared with field stars. <strong>The</strong> latter result <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

applies to the <strong>in</strong>ner disk, as traced by silicate features. <strong>The</strong> outer disk may still be<br />

different between cluster and field populati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

4.4.2 Comparis<strong>on</strong> with Other Samples<br />

<strong>The</strong> young stars with disks observed by the c2d team with IRS spectroscopy (c2d IRS<br />

sample) are scattered across the sky <strong>in</strong> the five molecular clouds studied (Ol<strong>of</strong>ss<strong>on</strong> et<br />

al. 2009). <strong>The</strong> other four clouds studied by the c2d are Chamaele<strong>on</strong> II, Lupus, Perseus<br />

and Ophiuchus. All clouds are nearby (with<strong>in</strong> 300 pc), span a range <strong>of</strong> star-formati<strong>on</strong><br />

activity, have typical median ages <strong>of</strong> a few Myr and have a spread between more<br />

(Perseus and Ophiuchus) and less (Cha II and Lupus) clustered YSO populati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

(Evans et al. 2009). <strong>The</strong> results from this sample are also compared to the results <strong>in</strong><br />

Serpens <strong>in</strong> Figures 4.9 and 4.13. A c<strong>on</strong>spicuous similarity is seen between the samples.<br />

Note that Ol<strong>of</strong>ss<strong>on</strong> et al. (2009) do not analyze the 20 µm silicate feature <strong>in</strong> this same<br />

manner and, therefore, S 20µm<br />

peak<br />

for the c2d IRS sample is miss<strong>in</strong>g from the right panel<br />

<strong>in</strong> Figure 4.13.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!