30.08.2014 Views

Observational Constraints on The Evolution of Dust in ...

Observational Constraints on The Evolution of Dust in ...

Observational Constraints on The Evolution of Dust in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

148 From Protoplanetary Disks to Planetary Systems<br />

imply that radial mix<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> these crystals is more efficient than vertical mix<strong>in</strong>g, which<br />

is resp<strong>on</strong>sible for the crystall<strong>in</strong>ity fracti<strong>on</strong> decrease <strong>in</strong> the disk midplane.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the models <strong>of</strong> Ciesla (2007) for outward transport <strong>of</strong> high temperature<br />

materials, variati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong> radial transport dynamics with height produce vertical<br />

gradients <strong>in</strong> the crystall<strong>in</strong>e fracti<strong>on</strong>s, such that the upper layers <strong>of</strong> the disk will have<br />

lower crystall<strong>in</strong>ity fracti<strong>on</strong>s than the midplane populati<strong>on</strong>. If that is the case, the<br />

observati<strong>on</strong>s discussed here, which probe the disk surface <strong>on</strong>ly, lead to lower limits <strong>on</strong><br />

the real crystall<strong>in</strong>e fracti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> disk midplanes. In this scenario, planets (and comets)<br />

form<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the disk midplane would have higher crystall<strong>in</strong>e abundances than those<br />

derived here for the disk surfaces, which are compatible with what has been observed<br />

<strong>in</strong> our Solar System. However, this model does not make predicti<strong>on</strong>s for the time<br />

evoluti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the systems. Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the vertical and radial mix<strong>in</strong>g processes with<br />

evoluti<strong>on</strong>ary models such as those <strong>of</strong> Visser & Dullem<strong>on</strong>d (2010) are needed to <strong>in</strong>vestigate<br />

whether older and younger disks could still show the same distributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

crystall<strong>in</strong>ity fracti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the upper layers <strong>of</strong> disks, as observed here.<br />

6.6 C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

This paper presents the spectral decompositi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Spitzer/IRS spectra us<strong>in</strong>g the B2C<br />

decompositi<strong>on</strong> model <strong>of</strong> Ol<strong>of</strong>ss<strong>on</strong> et al. (2010). M<strong>in</strong>eralogical compositi<strong>on</strong>s and size<br />

distributi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> dust gra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the surface layers <strong>of</strong> protoplanetary disks are derived<br />

for 139 YSOs bel<strong>on</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g to four young star clusters us<strong>in</strong>g the same method.<br />

Serpens and Taurus are used as prototypes <strong>of</strong> young regi<strong>on</strong>s, where most stars are<br />

still surrounded by disks, while Upper Sco and η Cha represent the older b<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> disk<br />

evoluti<strong>on</strong>, where a large fracti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the disks have already dissipated but some massive<br />

protoplanetary disks are left. <strong>The</strong> large number <strong>of</strong> objects analyzed allows statistical<br />

results that po<strong>in</strong>t to the ma<strong>in</strong> processes that affect the gra<strong>in</strong> size distributi<strong>on</strong> and<br />

compositi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> dust <strong>in</strong> protoplanetary disks. Furthermore, the usage <strong>of</strong> the same<br />

analysis method for regi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> different mean ages allow a study <strong>of</strong> evoluti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

dust parameters with time.<br />

Our large sample does not show a preferential gra<strong>in</strong> size or crystall<strong>in</strong>ity fracti<strong>on</strong><br />

with disk geometry, c<strong>on</strong>trary to earlier analyses based <strong>on</strong> smaller samples. Also,<br />

younger and older regi<strong>on</strong>s have very similar distributi<strong>on</strong>s. <strong>The</strong> difference between<br />

mean mass-averaged gra<strong>in</strong> sizes for the warm and cold comp<strong>on</strong>ents <strong>of</strong> a given starform<strong>in</strong>g<br />

regi<strong>on</strong> is small, however a c<strong>on</strong>siderable difference is seen between the ranges<br />

<strong>of</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> sizes spanned <strong>in</strong> both comp<strong>on</strong>ents. <strong>The</strong> cold mass-averaged gra<strong>in</strong> sizes never<br />

reach the biggest size modelled (6 µm) while the warm mass-averaged gra<strong>in</strong> sizes<br />

span the entire range <strong>of</strong> sizes modeled. <strong>The</strong> crystall<strong>in</strong>ity fracti<strong>on</strong>s derived for <strong>in</strong>ner<br />

(warm) and outer (cold) disks are typically 10 – 20%, and not correlated. <strong>The</strong> cold<br />

crystall<strong>in</strong>ity fracti<strong>on</strong> shows a larger spread than the warm. No str<strong>on</strong>g difference is seen<br />

between the overall mean warm and cold crystall<strong>in</strong>ity fracti<strong>on</strong>. With<strong>in</strong> the crystall<strong>in</strong>e<br />

dust populati<strong>on</strong>, more enstatite is found <strong>in</strong> the warm comp<strong>on</strong>ent and more forsterite<br />

<strong>in</strong> the cold comp<strong>on</strong>ent. <strong>The</strong> differences are not very significant, however.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!