Tally.ERP 9 Series A Release 3.0 Stat.900 Version 137

The payment entry recorded in current financial year for the VAT payable amount of previous
financial year was not being captured in Form 205.
This issue has been resolved.
On recording an inter-state sales entry made with CST and excise ledgers, the value of excise
duty, education cess and secondary education cess was not being captured as a part of the
assessable value in E-CST Sales Details.
This issue has been resolved.
In case of Accounts Only Company the CST amount entered for Inter-state Purchases in
Accounting Invoice mode was not being captured in Appendix II.
This issue has been resolved.
Version 93
Issues Resolved
The assessable value and CST amount specified for VAT ledger in journal entry made using
Adjustment Towards CST in Used for field was being captured with a negative sign in column
B - Sales Taxable U/S 8 (2)/ 8 (2A) of CST Form III (B).
This issue has been resolved.
The assessable value of entry made using Inter-State Purchases as the VAT/Tax class was
being captured incorrectly under Value of Goods column of Appendix II.
This issue has been resolved.
Version 92
Enhancements
In the VAT Payment Details screen of Payment voucher, when CST is selected in Payment
towards field and Type of Payment is set to Not Applicable, the option Date of Submission
will be displayed. The date entered here will be captured in Date of submission column
of e-CST template file - CST_RET_FORM3B.xls.
Issues Resolved
In the Report Generation screen of E-CST return, the Ouput File Name was being captured
as CST_RET_FORMB.xls.
This issue has been resolved and the Output File Name is being captured as
CST_RET_FORM3B.xls.
The purchase invoice number and date were being captured instead of Supplier Invoice
Number and Date in CST Appendix II.
This issue has been resolved.
Tally.ERP 9 Release Notes for Stat.900
©Tally Solutions Pvt. Ltd. 59