02.10.2014 Views

Guidelines for a Palliative Approach in Residential Aged Care

Guidelines for a Palliative Approach in Residential Aged Care

Guidelines for a Palliative Approach in Residential Aged Care

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

To assist <strong>in</strong> such a discussion, a decision aid has been devised (see table below) that can be<br />

used <strong>for</strong> family members of residents that are cognitively impaired and <strong>for</strong> those residents who<br />

are cognitively <strong>in</strong>tact and / or their family members [188] (Level EO). The aim of this aid is to<br />

help residents and their families decide whether to pursue tube feed<strong>in</strong>g. There are three basic<br />

components: (1) <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation on options and outcomes; (2) steps to decision mak<strong>in</strong>g that are<br />

based on the resident’s preferences, personal values and cl<strong>in</strong>ical situation; and (3) a documented<br />

treatment plan designed to put these steps <strong>in</strong>to operation [188] (Level EO).<br />

Table 12: Tube feed<strong>in</strong>g decision aid [188]<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation to be provided to the<br />

resident and family should <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

• Common causes of eat<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

swallow<strong>in</strong>g problems <strong>in</strong> older persons:<br />

• Technical considerations regard<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

placement and use of PEG tubes:<br />

• Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of substitute / proxy decision<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g (if not already discussed):<br />

• The risks and benefits of tube feed<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

• The option of supportive / com<strong>for</strong>t<br />

care (e.g. hand feed<strong>in</strong>g; responsive to<br />

resident’s requests regard<strong>in</strong>g the need <strong>for</strong>,<br />

or the refusal of, food and fluids); and<br />

• Some considerations regard<strong>in</strong>g future<br />

discont<strong>in</strong>uation of PEG tube (e.g. when<br />

and how often will the need <strong>for</strong> the PEG<br />

tube be reviewed; who can request a<br />

review / discont<strong>in</strong>uation and is there a<br />

process <strong>for</strong> this).<br />

Steps to decision mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

should <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

• Guid<strong>in</strong>g the resident and their family through what they<br />

have learned about PEG tubes:<br />

• How to apply this knowledge to the resident’s<br />

preferences, personal values, and cl<strong>in</strong>ical situation:<br />

• What is the resident’s situation?<br />

• What would the resident want?<br />

• How is the decision affect<strong>in</strong>g the family?<br />

• What questions need answer<strong>in</strong>g be<strong>for</strong>e the resident / or<br />

their family can make a fully <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>med decision?<br />

• Who should decide about PEG placement?<br />

• When should the PEG be disbanded; and<br />

• What is the resident’s / or his / her family’s overall<br />

thoughts about the decision?<br />

Non-pharmacological management<br />

Numerous nutritional benefits have been noted when frail residents have been <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> a<br />

simple exercise program such as walk<strong>in</strong>g; <strong>for</strong> example, enhanced appetite, improved prote<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>take, improved bowel function (decreased constipation), and a decreased likelihood of glucose<br />

<strong>in</strong>tolerance [187] (Level EO). However, some caution should be observed, because the population<br />

that was studied was not receiv<strong>in</strong>g a palliative approach to their care.<br />

The use of more expensive programs, such as high-<strong>in</strong>tensity or endurance (strength-build<strong>in</strong>g),<br />

with frail residents is not recommended, due to a lack of significant beneficial results <strong>for</strong><br />

participants <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> studies of these programs [200] (Level II).<br />

92 <strong>Guidel<strong>in</strong>es</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Palliative</strong> <strong>Approach</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Residential</strong> <strong>Aged</strong> <strong>Care</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!