02.10.2014 Views

Guidelines for a Palliative Approach in Residential Aged Care

Guidelines for a Palliative Approach in Residential Aged Care

Guidelines for a Palliative Approach in Residential Aged Care

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Several Work<strong>in</strong>g Party members convened focus groups with NCISN members <strong>in</strong> each state<br />

and territory to ensure that consultation regard<strong>in</strong>g the draft <strong>Guidel<strong>in</strong>es</strong> was nation-wide,<br />

representative and generalisible. Participants (N = 176) represented a broad cross section<br />

of aged care and palliative care health professionals <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g, general practitioners (GPs),<br />

palliative care medical specialists, aged care and palliative care nurses, and allied health<br />

professionals. Academics with relevant expertise <strong>in</strong> the area, representatives of various peak<br />

bodies, coord<strong>in</strong>ators of volunteers, and consumers were also <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the focus groups.<br />

The <strong>Guidel<strong>in</strong>es</strong> were sent out to participants one week prior to the focus group to provide them<br />

with sufficient time to consider their response. The 104 <strong>Guidel<strong>in</strong>es</strong> were <strong>for</strong>matted to allow<br />

focus group participants to respond to each guidel<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> one of three ways; 1) supported, 2)<br />

supported with revisions or 3) not supported. The <strong>Guidel<strong>in</strong>es</strong> were presented <strong>in</strong> this <strong>for</strong>mat at<br />

all of the focus groups. (See Appendix G <strong>for</strong> an example of how the <strong>Guidel<strong>in</strong>es</strong> were presented.)<br />

Each participant received a hard copy of the <strong>Guidel<strong>in</strong>es</strong> well <strong>in</strong> advance of the meet<strong>in</strong>g, with<br />

the <strong>in</strong>vitation to provide written comments to be discussed at the focus group meet<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Because of the number of guidel<strong>in</strong>es to be reviewed it was decided by the project work<strong>in</strong>g party to<br />

divide the task and <strong>in</strong>volve two focus groups <strong>in</strong> every state and territory. (Assessment, co-morbidities<br />

and physical symptoms were discussed <strong>in</strong> both groups because participants felt that this area was<br />

crucial to ensur<strong>in</strong>g a palliative approach was appropriate to the context of RACFs.)<br />

The first focus groups discussed:<br />

• assessment, co-morbidities and physical symptoms,<br />

• advance care plann<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

• family support,<br />

• bereavement,<br />

• spirituality, and<br />

• volunteers.<br />

The second focus group discussed:<br />

• assessment, co-morbidities and physical symptoms,<br />

• documentation of social relationships,<br />

• attitudes to palliative care,<br />

• psychosocial care, and<br />

• culture.<br />

A brief overview of the development of the <strong>Guidel<strong>in</strong>es</strong>, the literature review and the grad<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

evidence was provided by the facilitator to participants to beg<strong>in</strong> the focus group. The way <strong>in</strong><br />

which rural, remote, cultural and Indigenous issues were be<strong>in</strong>g covered on a national level was<br />

also highlighted.<br />

Each focus group then worked through their requisite guidel<strong>in</strong>e subjects with every guidel<strong>in</strong>e<br />

presented on overhead to facilitate discussion. As well as hav<strong>in</strong>g the ‘background questions’ <strong>in</strong><br />

m<strong>in</strong>d, the groups were asked to consider (a) any gaps <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Guidel<strong>in</strong>es</strong>, (b) any recommendations<br />

aris<strong>in</strong>g out of the <strong>Guidel<strong>in</strong>es</strong> and (c) additional suggestions <strong>for</strong> evidence/literature.<br />

30 <strong>Guidel<strong>in</strong>es</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Palliative</strong> <strong>Approach</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Residential</strong> <strong>Aged</strong> <strong>Care</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!