06.10.2014 Views

視覚障害者とリスニング・テスト:センター試験と英検の比較 - 筑波技術大学

視覚障害者とリスニング・テスト:センター試験と英検の比較 - 筑波技術大学

視覚障害者とリスニング・テスト:センター試験と英検の比較 - 筑波技術大学

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

18 <br />

<br />

<br />

2 <br />

2 <br />

2 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

18 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1.5 <br />

1.3 <br />

2006 1 1 <br />

2 <br />

[1]<br />

<br />

2 [2]<br />

2005 <br />

2 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

2 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1.5 <br />

<br />

<br />

1.5 <br />

45 30 <br />

2 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

2 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1.5


[3]<br />

<br />

2 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

2 <br />

[4]<br />

7 4 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

2005 4 2006 3 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

2004 910 <br />

35,000 2 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

2003 2 10 <br />

<br />

1<br />

<br />

<br />

2 <br />

1 <br />

<br />

<br />

IC CD <br />

CD<br />

<br />

45 30 1.5 <br />

<br />

<br />

10 <br />

20 <br />

<br />

2 2


2 <br />

<br />

<br />

1<br />

<br />

<br />

3 <br />

<br />

60.84, SD17.40<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

45 2700 40 2400 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

2 <br />

<br />

r=0.58 <br />

n=11<br />

<br />

n=9<br />

34<br />

<br />

<br />

22 r=0.58<br />

3<br />

r=0.08<br />

32 100 <br />

4<br />

r=0.26


n=5<br />

<br />

2 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

5<br />

r=-0.32<br />

6<br />

r=-0.81<br />

2 1 <br />

2 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1 4 B<br />

1 <br />

1.5 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

30 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1.5 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1


1 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

[5]<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

[7] <br />

2<br />

<br />

2 / <br />

1.00 <br />

0.500 <br />

<br />

<br />

=1 ABS<br />

2<br />

4616 10% <br />

3 <br />

<br />

4 <br />

<br />

6<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

16 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

23 25 <br />

3 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

[6]<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Keely[8] 2<br />

<br />

<br />

Kelly <br />

G M P <br />

pU<br />

pL =pU <br />

pL idp 1.000<br />

<br />

<br />

Ebel[9] <br />

25 9


TOEFL [6] <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

2 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

2 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

TOEFL <br />

<br />

<br />

[6]<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

18 1 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

[1011]<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

[121314]<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1


2<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

3<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

4<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

5<br />

<br />

<br />

Miller <br />

7 [15] <br />

7 <br />

2 [16]<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

6<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

7 1 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

[12] <br />

<br />

123<br />

4 4 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

[17]<br />

<br />

7<br />

Takano1993<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

7


[1] 1 18<br />

<br />

2005<br />

[2] <br />

2 ~5 <br />

2003<br />

[3] <br />

13<br />

99-1152003<br />

[4] <br />

– Are they slow readers or poor<br />

readers? –. Language Education & technology, 42:169-185,<br />

2005.<br />

[5] <br />

Unicorn Journal, May10, 2-11, 2004.<br />

[6] Sage, Kristie & Tanaka, Nozumi, So what are we listening<br />

for?: A comparison of the English listening constructs<br />

in the Japanese National Centre Teat and TOEFL iBT,<br />

Authentic Communication: Proceedings of the 5th Anuual<br />

JALT Pan-SIG Conference, May 13-14, 2006, Shizuoka,<br />

Japan: Tokai University College of Marine Science.2006<br />

[7] IRT <br />

www.modern.tsukuba.ac.jp/~mochizuki/IRT/IRT02a. pdf,<br />

2004<br />

[8] Kelly, T. L.: The selection of upper and lower groups for<br />

the validation of test items. The Journal of Educational<br />

Psychology, 3017-241939.<br />

[9] Ebel, R. L.: Essentials of educational measurement3rd<br />

edPrintice-Hall1979.<br />

[10] 2002<br />

[11] <br />

- <br />

2002<br />

[12] <br />

2000<br />

[13] <br />

2000<br />

[14] Goldstein, E. B.: Cognitive Psychology, Thompson<br />

Wandsworth, 2005.<br />

[15] Miller, G. A. The magical number seven, plus or<br />

minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing<br />

information, Psychological Review, 63, 81-97, 1956<br />

[16] <br />

<br />

15-311997<br />

[17] Takano, Yotaro: A temporary decline of thinking ability<br />

during foreign language processing. Journal of Cross-<br />

Cultural Psychology, 244445-462, 1993.


National University Corporation Tsukuba University of Technology<br />

Cognitive Resource Allocation in Performance of the Listening Comprehension<br />

Tests for the Blind<br />

Hiroshi KATOH and Kazuko AOKI<br />

Research and Support Center on Higher Education for the Hearing and Visually Impaired,<br />

Tsukuba University of Technology<br />

Abstract: From the 2006 fiscal year, the English listening test was introduced to the National Center Test for University<br />

Admissions. This is expected to have a great impact on English education in regular schools and schools for the blind<br />

in Japan. We conducted two types of English listening comprehension tests; The J-NCT English Listening Test and The<br />

EIKEN test, both were adapted for students with visual impairment. We discuss the performance of the two tests in<br />

relation to the properties of the two tests and cognitive resource allocation.<br />

Keywords: Blind, The J-NCT English Listening Test, EIKEN, Cognitive Resource Allocation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!