視覚障害者とリスニング・テスト:センター試験と英検の比較 - 筑波技術大学
視覚障害者とリスニング・テスト:センター試験と英検の比較 - 筑波技術大学
視覚障害者とリスニング・テスト:センター試験と英検の比較 - 筑波技術大学
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
18 <br />
<br />
<br />
2 <br />
2 <br />
2 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
18 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1.5 <br />
1.3 <br />
2006 1 1 <br />
2 <br />
[1]<br />
<br />
2 [2]<br />
2005 <br />
2 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
2 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1.5 <br />
<br />
<br />
1.5 <br />
45 30 <br />
2 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
2 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1.5
[3]<br />
<br />
2 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
2 <br />
[4]<br />
7 4 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
2005 4 2006 3 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
2004 910 <br />
35,000 2 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
2003 2 10 <br />
<br />
1<br />
<br />
<br />
2 <br />
1 <br />
<br />
<br />
IC CD <br />
CD<br />
<br />
45 30 1.5 <br />
<br />
<br />
10 <br />
20 <br />
<br />
2 2
2 <br />
<br />
<br />
1<br />
<br />
<br />
3 <br />
<br />
60.84, SD17.40<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
45 2700 40 2400 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
2 <br />
<br />
r=0.58 <br />
n=11<br />
<br />
n=9<br />
34<br />
<br />
<br />
22 r=0.58<br />
3<br />
r=0.08<br />
32 100 <br />
4<br />
r=0.26
n=5<br />
<br />
2 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
5<br />
r=-0.32<br />
6<br />
r=-0.81<br />
2 1 <br />
2 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1 4 B<br />
1 <br />
1.5 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
30 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1.5 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1
1 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[5]<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[7] <br />
2<br />
<br />
2 / <br />
1.00 <br />
0.500 <br />
<br />
<br />
=1 ABS<br />
2<br />
4616 10% <br />
3 <br />
<br />
4 <br />
<br />
6<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
16 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
23 25 <br />
3 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[6]<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Keely[8] 2<br />
<br />
<br />
Kelly <br />
G M P <br />
pU<br />
pL =pU <br />
pL idp 1.000<br />
<br />
<br />
Ebel[9] <br />
25 9
TOEFL [6] <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
2 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
2 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
TOEFL <br />
<br />
<br />
[6]<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
18 1 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[1011]<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[121314]<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1
2<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
3<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
4<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
5<br />
<br />
<br />
Miller <br />
7 [15] <br />
7 <br />
2 [16]<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
6<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
7 1 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[12] <br />
<br />
123<br />
4 4 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[17]<br />
<br />
7<br />
Takano1993<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
7
[1] 1 18<br />
<br />
2005<br />
[2] <br />
2 ~5 <br />
2003<br />
[3] <br />
13<br />
99-1152003<br />
[4] <br />
– Are they slow readers or poor<br />
readers? –. Language Education & technology, 42:169-185,<br />
2005.<br />
[5] <br />
Unicorn Journal, May10, 2-11, 2004.<br />
[6] Sage, Kristie & Tanaka, Nozumi, So what are we listening<br />
for?: A comparison of the English listening constructs<br />
in the Japanese National Centre Teat and TOEFL iBT,<br />
Authentic Communication: Proceedings of the 5th Anuual<br />
JALT Pan-SIG Conference, May 13-14, 2006, Shizuoka,<br />
Japan: Tokai University College of Marine Science.2006<br />
[7] IRT <br />
www.modern.tsukuba.ac.jp/~mochizuki/IRT/IRT02a. pdf,<br />
2004<br />
[8] Kelly, T. L.: The selection of upper and lower groups for<br />
the validation of test items. The Journal of Educational<br />
Psychology, 3017-241939.<br />
[9] Ebel, R. L.: Essentials of educational measurement3rd<br />
edPrintice-Hall1979.<br />
[10] 2002<br />
[11] <br />
- <br />
2002<br />
[12] <br />
2000<br />
[13] <br />
2000<br />
[14] Goldstein, E. B.: Cognitive Psychology, Thompson<br />
Wandsworth, 2005.<br />
[15] Miller, G. A. The magical number seven, plus or<br />
minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing<br />
information, Psychological Review, 63, 81-97, 1956<br />
[16] <br />
<br />
15-311997<br />
[17] Takano, Yotaro: A temporary decline of thinking ability<br />
during foreign language processing. Journal of Cross-<br />
Cultural Psychology, 244445-462, 1993.
National University Corporation Tsukuba University of Technology<br />
Cognitive Resource Allocation in Performance of the Listening Comprehension<br />
Tests for the Blind<br />
Hiroshi KATOH and Kazuko AOKI<br />
Research and Support Center on Higher Education for the Hearing and Visually Impaired,<br />
Tsukuba University of Technology<br />
Abstract: From the 2006 fiscal year, the English listening test was introduced to the National Center Test for University<br />
Admissions. This is expected to have a great impact on English education in regular schools and schools for the blind<br />
in Japan. We conducted two types of English listening comprehension tests; The J-NCT English Listening Test and The<br />
EIKEN test, both were adapted for students with visual impairment. We discuss the performance of the two tests in<br />
relation to the properties of the two tests and cognitive resource allocation.<br />
Keywords: Blind, The J-NCT English Listening Test, EIKEN, Cognitive Resource Allocation