11.10.2014 Views

Alternative Project Delivery - Texas Water Development Board

Alternative Project Delivery - Texas Water Development Board

Alternative Project Delivery - Texas Water Development Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 2<br />

DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>Project</strong> delivery methods as currently practiced in the water and wastewater industry<br />

tend to fall into three groups:<br />

• Traditional Design-Bid-Build (“DBB”) and Design-Build (“DB”);<br />

• Engineer-At-Risk (“EAR”) and Engineer-Procure-Construct (“EPC”); and,<br />

• Design-Build-Operate (“DBO”) and Build-Own-Operate-Transfer (“BOOT”).<br />

These groups are classified based upon the number of discrete contractual or<br />

informally defined relationships between the Owner, Design Engineer, Construction<br />

Contractor and the Operator. In the traditional DBB there are generally three<br />

contracts or relationships. In DB there are generally two contracts. DBO and BOOT<br />

generally involve a single contract. A glossary is included in the Appendix defining<br />

the terms in bold throughout this section.<br />

Beyond these basic project characteristics there are few criteria that clearly define one<br />

project delivery approach versus another. Rather, there appears to be a spectrum of<br />

options available for all of the key contract terms and conditions. Consequently, the<br />

following discussion of defining features for project delivery methods has been based<br />

on trends we have observed in the use of alternative project delivery.<br />

The table on the following page provides a schematic of the relationships of the<br />

project participants for DBB, DB and DBO and BOOT. Moving from left to right<br />

across the columns the Owner is, in general, relinquishing control over more aspects<br />

of the project in return for the potential of reduced cost and accelerated project<br />

delivery schedule, along with allocating more risk to the private vendor. The pros and<br />

cons of each type of project delivery alternative are identified. The conditions under<br />

which each type of project delivery is preferred is provided in the bottom row of the<br />

table.<br />

The detailed discussion following the table includes for each method:<br />

• General Description;<br />

• Characterization of the Contractual Issues;<br />

• Identification of Potential Benefits; and<br />

• Areas of Concern.<br />

B1381-Sect2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!