Alternative Project Delivery - Texas Water Development Board

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Areas of Concern Potential Areas Of Concern Traditional Versus DB/DBO Approach On Public Projects Criteria Traditional Approach DB/DBO Approach Contractual Arrangements • Separate contracts with Contractor and Engineer allow Owner to define roles and responsibilities of each. • Joint venture team may not have long history together. • Allocation of responsibility between Contractor and Designer is developed independently of Owner and assignment of responsibility may be unclear to Owner. Competition • Larger universe of individual service providers (Designers/ Contractors/Operators) should allow for more competition. • Fewer DB entities exist because of uniqueness of relationships and liability, making smaller pool for Owner to choose from. Smaller pool could make for less competition. • Advantage to Owner could be pairing of experienced designer and Contractor and ability to eliminate bad teams during selective procurement process. Legal Barriers • Texas state public entities procurement law provides a wellrecognized, historically based framework for the traditional approach. • Texas state law requires submission of complete water plans prior to regulatory approval. • According to Texas state public entities procurement law, public entities must use the traditional design-bid-build process to obtain water/wastewater infrastructure. Training/Workshop R. W. Beck 3-7
Alternative Project Delivery Methods Workshop Texas Water Development Board Participant Evaluation Staff Title/Position: ________________________________________________ Technical Role: Engineer, Attorney, Geologist, Planner, Manager, Other: Please identify which components of the workshop were most useful? Please identify which components of the workshop were least useful? How would you rate the presenters as to their knowledge of the material and approach? Very Good Good Fair Poor What additional materials would be useful to you on this subject matter? Other comments: 3-8 Texas Water Development Board Training/Workshop
Page 1 and 2:
Alternative Project Delivery Texas
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents VI. School Distri
Page 5 and 6:
Executive Summary statutory/regulat
Page 7 and 8:
Table of Contents Areas of Concern.
Page 9 and 10:
Section 1 INTRODUCTION Introduction
Page 11 and 12:
Implementation of Stricter Regulati
Page 13 and 14:
Introduction TABLE 1-1 GLOBAL WATER
Page 15 and 16:
Introduction These large private fi
Page 17 and 18:
Section 2 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT DE
Page 19 and 20:
Traditional Design-Bid-Build (“DB
Page 21 and 22:
Description of Project Delivery Met
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Engineer-Procure-Construct (“EPC
Page 29 and 30: Description of Project Delivery Met
Page 37: Description of Project Delivery Met
Page 40 and 41: PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS TRADITI
Page 42 and 43: Section 3 One of the critical areas
Page 44 and 45: Section 3 Figure 3-2 DB or DBO Appr
Page 46 and 47: Section 3 TABLE 3-1 POTENTIAL AREAS
Page 48 and 49: Section 4 • The company, BexarMet
Page 50 and 51: Section 4 receive an up-front conce
Page 52 and 53: Section 4 • Rate stabilization
Page 54 and 55: Section 4 Pursuant to stringent tim
Page 56 and 57: Appendix A GLOSSARY - B - BOOT: Bui
Page 58 and 59: LEGAL REVIEW OF ALTERNATIVE DELIVER
Page 60 and 61: Legal Review of Alternative Deliver
Page 64 and 65: Wastewater Legal Review of Alternat
Page 68 and 69: San Antonio Water System Legal Revi
Page 74 and 75: Neil Callahan - National Director f
Page 76 and 77: Comparison Of Traditional Vs. Alter
Page 78 and 79: Comparison Table Comparison Of Trad
Page 82 and 83: ISSUES CHECKLIST Introduction The d
Page 84 and 85: Issues Checklist • Public input o
Page 86 and 87: Design-Build-Operate (DBO) Issues C
show all

Alternative Project Delivery - Texas Water Development Board

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?