11.10.2014 Views

Alternative Project Delivery - Texas Water Development Board

Alternative Project Delivery - Texas Water Development Board

Alternative Project Delivery - Texas Water Development Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Examples of Recent or Ongoing <strong>Alternative</strong> <strong>Delivery</strong> <strong>Project</strong>s<br />

appointed by the City. Under the approved articles of incorporation, the City Council<br />

must approve the issuance of any debt for the project, any design, construction or<br />

operating contracts, and the establishment of water rates.<br />

Facility<br />

The facility can be described as follows:<br />

60 MGD surface water transmission and treatment facilities.<br />

The definition of specific facilities has been left for the DBO entities to propose<br />

inclusive of:<br />

• Treatment process;<br />

• Physical facilities; and<br />

• Organization, including regionalization, etc.<br />

Benefits<br />

City officials contend such a plan could save millions of dollars over traditional<br />

development methods.<br />

Present Status<br />

As of December 2000, the City had solicited for DBO proposals but had not yet<br />

selected a vendor team. The City’s proposal required a concept design and<br />

qualifications of responding firms but did not initially request budgets. In addition,<br />

the proposers were asked to suggest means of financing the project. Eight proposals<br />

have been submitted to the City. It was reported that the City will short list<br />

respondents and then request price proposals for selection of the DBO contractor as<br />

the next step in the process.<br />

Cranston, Rhode Island<br />

Background<br />

In the early 1990’s, the City of Cranston was in poor financial health and was facing a<br />

State Department of Environmental Management Consent Order to up-grade its aged<br />

wastewater collection system and treatment plant. The wastewater utility was operated<br />

as a municipal enterprise fund. The revenues from user rates were intended to fully<br />

support the sewer enterprise fund. The improvements mandated by the Consent Order<br />

for the upgrade where evaluated by the City’s consultant engineer and determined to<br />

present significant economic hardship to the City. The City pursued other alternative<br />

means to comply with the Consent Order.<br />

In 1996 the City selected the proposal of Poseidon Resource Corporation of Stamford,<br />

CO to design, build, operate and finance the necessary improvements to the City’s<br />

wastewater system. The term of the contract was 25 years. The City would also<br />

B1381-Sect4 R. W. Beck 4-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!