Alternative Project Delivery - Texas Water Development Board
Alternative Project Delivery - Texas Water Development Board
Alternative Project Delivery - Texas Water Development Board
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Description of <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Delivery</strong> Methods<br />
various contract phases. These delay charges can be included in the competitive fixed<br />
fee for the services of the DBO Contractor.<br />
Benefits<br />
A DBO project delivery has all the advantages of a DB type project delivery identified<br />
in the prior section including:<br />
• Single point of contractual accountability for design, construction and operation;<br />
• Cooperative teaming effort of the Design Consultant and the Construction<br />
Contractor can reduce project capital costs and shorten schedule;<br />
• A collaborative design and construction effort competitively procured can foster<br />
innovation;<br />
• Concurrent design, permitting and construction activities can shorten project<br />
schedule; and<br />
• The certainty of the project cost is determined at an earlier point in the project.<br />
The addition of the Operator to a project delivery team has the potential to create a<br />
new dynamic in the design process. For example, if the project selection criteria for<br />
the DBO Contractor includes life-cycle project costs, then the facility's annual<br />
operating expense can be a more significant factor in DBO Contractor selection than<br />
the consideration of only the installed project capital cost. With a significant<br />
competitive incentive to minimize project operating expenses, contract Operators<br />
have the opportunity to value engineer designs to optimize the facility's operability.<br />
This may involve technologies that have a higher installed capital cost but will result<br />
in significantly lower operating costs. Therefore, the overall life-cycle project costs<br />
are reduced as compared to traditional approaches.<br />
Some DBO contracts include shifting the long-term capital operating risk to the DBO<br />
Contractors. The long term capital operating risk is associated with the future cost to<br />
maintain a facility. Other terms used by utilities to describe these expenses include<br />
extraordinary maintenance, non-routine maintenance and major capital maintenance.<br />
When the Operator is obligated to provide cost guarantees for this long term<br />
operating capital risk, they have an incentive to assure optimal equipment quality to<br />
minimize maintenance expense for the term of the contract and renewals. This may<br />
have significant cost benefit for the public.<br />
An additional benefit is that the rates for the utility can be reduced to a formula for the<br />
term of the contract because of the fixed cost-basis for operations. Many communities<br />
have found it beneficial for economic growth and development to be able to predict<br />
their utility rates long term with the added certainty of a guaranteed contract.<br />
Areas of Concern<br />
Public Owners must understand that to reap the benefits of guaranteed fixed<br />
construction and fixed operating costs, they will commensurately have to relinquish,<br />
control over project construction details, schedule, and operation. Appropriate due<br />
diligence with respect to the competency and performance of the vendor team in<br />
similar circumstances is critical to project success.<br />
B1381-Sect2 R. W. Beck 2-15