19.10.2014 Views

CHAPTER 27 • Statistical Process Control

CHAPTER 27 • Statistical Process Control

CHAPTER 27 • Statistical Process Control

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>27</strong>-14 <strong>CHAPTER</strong> <strong>27</strong> • <strong>Statistical</strong> <strong>Process</strong> <strong>Control</strong><br />

plotted for Sample 1. The center line is at <strong>27</strong>5 mV. The upper and lower<br />

control limits are<br />

s<br />

m 3<br />

2n <strong>27</strong>5 3 43<br />

<strong>27</strong>5 64.5 339.5 mV<br />

24<br />

(UCL)<br />

s<br />

m 3<br />

2n <strong>27</strong>5 3 43<br />

<strong>27</strong>5 64.5 210.5 mV<br />

24<br />

(LCL)<br />

As is common, we have labeled the control limits UCL for upper control limit<br />

and LCL for lower control limit.<br />

EXAMPLE <strong>27</strong>.4 Interpreting x charts<br />

Figure <strong>27</strong>.4(b) is a typical x chart for a process in control. The means of the 20 samples<br />

do vary, but all lie within the range of variation marked out by the control limits. We<br />

are seeing the common cause variation of a stable process.<br />

Figures <strong>27</strong>.5 and <strong>27</strong>.6 illustrate two ways in which the process can go out of control.<br />

In Figure <strong>27</strong>.5, the process was disturbed by a special cause sometime between Sample<br />

12 and Sample 13. As a result, the mean tension for Sample 13 falls above the upper<br />

control limit. It is common practice to mark all out-of-control points with an “x” to<br />

call attention to them. A search for the cause begins as soon as we see a point out of<br />

control. Investigation finds that the mounting of the tension-measuring device had<br />

slipped, resulting in readings that were too high. When the problem was corrected,<br />

Samples 14 to 20 were again in control.<br />

Figure <strong>27</strong>.6 shows the effect of a steady upward drift in the process center, starting at<br />

Sample 11. You see that some time elapses before the x for Sample 18 is out of control.<br />

<strong>Process</strong> drift results from gradual changes such as the wearing of a cutting tool or overheating.<br />

The one-point-out signal works better for detecting sudden large disturbances<br />

than for detecting slow drifts in a process. ■<br />

400<br />

350<br />

UCL<br />

x<br />

Sample mean<br />

300<br />

250<br />

FIGURE <strong>27</strong>.5<br />

This x chart is identical to that in<br />

Figure <strong>27</strong>.4(b) except that a special<br />

cause has driven x for Sample 13<br />

above the upper control limit. The<br />

out-of-control point is marked with<br />

an x.<br />

200<br />

150<br />

LCL<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20<br />

Sample number

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!