22.10.2014 Views

Making Companies Safe - what works? (CCA ... - Unite the Union

Making Companies Safe - what works? (CCA ... - Unite the Union

Making Companies Safe - what works? (CCA ... - Unite the Union

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

37 The Norwegian Internal Control Regulation defines ‘internal control’ as “all systematic measures that an enterprise has to<br />

implement in order to ensure than an activity is planned, organised, carried out and maintained in accordance with<br />

requirements in work environment legislation and regulation.” (Gaupset, 2000: 329-330).<br />

38 Nielsen (2000).<br />

39 That is, that safe workplaces depend on management control.<br />

40 Frick et al. (2000: 6).<br />

41 Nichols and Tucker (2000).<br />

42 Nielsen (2000: 110). Emphasis added.<br />

43 Nichols and Tucker (2000: 293). See also, Walters and Frick (2000).<br />

44 Saksvik and Quinlan (2003: 92).<br />

45 Cited in Wokutch and VanSandt (2000: 389).<br />

46 Frick et al. (2000: 6-7).<br />

47 Frick and Wren (2000: 26).<br />

48 Nichols and Tucker (2000); Wokutch and VanSandt (2000: 374; 381-382); Lessin (1997).<br />

49 Nichols and Tucker (2000: 307).<br />

50 Gallagher (1997: 2). See also Krawiec (2003) who finds a similar lack of empirical support for internal compliance structures.<br />

51 Gunningham and Johnstone (2000: 136). See also Frick et al. (2000); Frick and Wren (2000); Nichols and Tucker (2000); Saksvik<br />

and Quinlan (2003).<br />

52 Gunningham and Johnstone (2000: 145).<br />

53 Gunningham and Johnstone (1999: 141).<br />

54 Gunningham and Johnstone (1999: 43-44; 2000: 136, 137-138).<br />

55 Discussed in Gallagher (1997: 2).<br />

56 Nichols and Tucker (2000: 299).<br />

57 Although not aimed specifically at health and safety management, internal compliance structures of <strong>the</strong> kind proposed by <strong>the</strong><br />

US Corporate Sentencing Guidelines 1991 are meant to establish internal systems of responsibility and control which ensure<br />

corporate compliance with respect to <strong>the</strong> full range of <strong>the</strong>ir legal obligations. They are: “a form of internal management<br />

control system; <strong>the</strong>y specify and communicate objectives, monitor performance, and motivate employees by linking rewards<br />

with desired behaviour” (McKendall et al., 2002: 372).<br />

58 Krawiec (2003: 510).<br />

59 McKendall et al. (2002: 380).<br />

60 Gaupset (2000: 333).<br />

61 Nichols and Tucker (2000: 292).<br />

62 Gunningham and Johnstone (1999: 45-46).<br />

63 Osborne and Zairi (1997).<br />

64 Gunningham and Johnstone (1999: 46).<br />

65 Nichols and Tucker (2000: 291).<br />

66 The Norwegian Internal Control Regulation defines internal control as all systematic measures that an enterprise has to<br />

implement in order to ensure that an activity is planned, organized, carried out and maintained in accordance with<br />

requirements in work environment legislation and regulation (Gaupset, 2000: 329-330).<br />

67 Flagstad (1995). See also Gunningham and Johnstone (1999: 76) who note that “this study is consistent with <strong>the</strong> individual<br />

observations of inspectors <strong>the</strong>mselves that while IC continues to work well for off-shore oil… for o<strong>the</strong>r high risk and<br />

sophisticated industrial sectors such as chemicals, and for already successful enterprises, performance overall had so far been<br />

disappointing”.<br />

68 Gunningham and Johnstone (1999: 76); Gaupset (2000: 341); Lindoe and Hansen (2000: 437).<br />

69 Gunningham and Johnstone (1999: 89; 93); Health and <strong>Safe</strong>ty Executive (2004).<br />

70 Wright (1998).<br />

71 Lindoe (1992) and Lauridsen (1995).<br />

72 Gunningham and Johnstone (1999 and 2000).<br />

73 Which includes a requirement to implement a SMS (Gunningham and Johnstone 1999: 72).<br />

74 Woolfson et al. (1997); Woolfson (forthcoming). See also Scott (2004).<br />

75 Frick et al. (2000: 9).<br />

76 Discussed in Gunningham and Johnstone (1999: 76).<br />

77 Gaupset (2000: 343).<br />

78 Saksvik and Quinlan (2003: 92).<br />

79 Beck et al. (1998); Lindoe and Hansen (2000); Walters and Frick (2000); Saksvik and Quinlan (2003).<br />

80 Saksvik and Quinlan (2003: 91).<br />

81 Saksvik and Quinlan (2003: 91).<br />

82 Walters and Frick (2000).<br />

83 Ryggvik (1998).<br />

84 Ryggvik 1998: 27).<br />

85 Ryggvik (1998: 20).<br />

86 Ryggvik (1998: 16).<br />

87 Ryggvik (1998: 27).<br />

88 Discussed in Nichols and Tucker (2000: 291-293).<br />

89 See for instance James and Walters (1997); James and Walters (1999: 83-105); and James and Walters (2002).<br />

90 Nichols and Tucker (2000).<br />

91 Gunningham and Johnstone (1999: 51).<br />

92 Gunningham and Johnstone (2000: 144).<br />

93 Smith and Tombs (1995).<br />

94 Gunningham and Johnstone (1999: 94). 101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!