Making Companies Safe - what works? (CCA ... - Unite the Union

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Making companies safe: What works? A report by Dr Courtney Davis Centre for Corporate Accountability Supported by
Contents INTRODUCTION 7 MAIN FINDINGS 13 PART ONE LEGAL REGULATION v VOLUNTARISM Chapter One: The Evidence 19 Chapter Two: Directors Duties 23 Chapter Three: Workforce Participation 29 Chapter Four: Conclusion 33 PART TWO SECURING COMPLIANCE THROUGH FORMAL ENFORCEMENT Chapter Five: The Evidence 41 Chapter Six: Implications for the HSE 49 PART THREE SECURING COMPLIANCE WITHOUT FORMAL ENFORCEMENT Chapter Seven: Campaigning and Educational Activities 59 Chapter Eight: The role of Partnerships 67 Chapter Nine: Arguing the Business Case for Safety 69 Chapter Ten: ‘Earned Autonomy’ or ‘Twin Track’ regulation 83 PART FOUR CONCLUSION Chapter Eleven: Conclusion 105 APPENDIX SELECT COMMITTEE ON WORK AND PENSIONS: EXTRACTS 107 REFERENCES 109 5
Page 1 and 2: Making companies safe: What works?
Page 3: Acknowledgments: Courtney Davis wou
Page 7 and 8: So for example, the new Strategy do
Page 9 and 10: “In recent years, there had been
Page 11 and 12: Chapter eight is a short chapter lo
Page 13 and 14: • The only sector-specific data o
Page 16: PART ONE Legal Regulation v Volunta
Page 19 and 20: self-regulation through the adoptio
Page 21 and 22: • A number of studies evaluating
Page 23 and 24: Gap in the law Yet despite the impo
Page 25 and 26: By September 2002 the Government ha
Page 27 and 28: Conclusion In conclusion, the Green
Page 29 and 30: effectiveness of safety representat
Page 32 and 33: Chapter Four Conclusion There is ve
Page 34: PARTS TWO & THREE Strategies to sec
Page 37 and 38: A recent HSE discussion paper illus
Page 40 and 41: Chapter Five The Health and Safety
Page 42 and 43: Support for these findings comes fr
Page 44 and 45: Gray and Scholz attempt to understa
Page 46 and 47: perceived low level of current fine
Page 48 and 49: Chapter Six The Implications for th
Page 50 and 51: five times greater than if one had
Page 52: Select Committee on Work and Pensio
Page 56:
The evidence reviewed in part two s
Page 59 and 60:
health risk management between “a
Page 61 and 62:
The relationship between knowledge
Page 63 and 64:
Conclusion Whatever factors prompt
Page 65 and 66:
16 This was at an aggregate level.
Page 67 and 68:
- the year that the initiative was
Page 69 and 70:
When safety does not pay (or does n
Page 71 and 72:
Similarly, firms might make an econ
Page 73 and 74:
However, even in the context of mul
Page 75 and 76:
does, exert a negative influence on
Page 77 and 78:
to cost “a little” or “nothin
Page 79 and 80:
For instance, when BP Grangemouth r
Page 82 and 83:
Chapter Ten ‘Earned Autonomy’ T
Page 84 and 85:
A similar experiment in self-regula
Page 86 and 87:
Whilst the original focus of TQM wa
Page 88 and 89:
“the more firms incorporate ethic
Page 90 and 91:
“In Norway the mandated model is
Page 92 and 93:
odies, pressure groups and/or the m
Page 94 and 95:
Health and Safety Management System
Page 96 and 97:
Gunningham and Johnstone argue that
Page 98 and 99:
Conclusion Proposals that some comp
Page 100 and 101:
37 The Norwegian Internal Control R
Page 102 and 103:
PART FOUR Conclusion 103
Page 104 and 105:
Chapter Eleven Conclusion The Healt
Page 106 and 107:
Appendix Select Committee on Work a
Page 108 and 109:
References Alder A., Tipping A. and
Page 110 and 111:
Health and Well-Being’, in Frick
Page 112 and 113:
Honey S., Hillage J. et al. (1997)
Page 114 and 115:
Nichols T. and Armstrong P. (1973)
Page 116 and 117:
Wokutch R.E. and VanSandt C.V. (200
show all

Making Companies Safe - what works? (CCA ... - Unite the Union

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?