22.10.2014 Views

Making Companies Safe - what works? (CCA ... - Unite the Union

Making Companies Safe - what works? (CCA ... - Unite the Union

Making Companies Safe - what works? (CCA ... - Unite the Union

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter Seven<br />

Campaigning, and educational<br />

Activities<br />

Campaigns<br />

Two HSE-commissioned reviews of <strong>the</strong> numerous UK evaluations of awareness-raising<br />

campaigns came to slightly conflicting conclusions about <strong>the</strong>ir value. Wright et al. state<br />

that <strong>the</strong>se evaluations have indicated that ‘such work is effective in raising awareness,<br />

and awareness is an important factor in improving health and safety precautions’ 1 . However,<br />

Hillage et al. concluded that while <strong>the</strong>re is evidence that HSE can ‘reach’ a significant<br />

proportion of employers, <strong>the</strong>re is:<br />

“very little evidence that being ‘reached’ by <strong>the</strong> campaign actually translates into<br />

action, let alone positive and demonstrable benefits in occupational health.” 2<br />

Thus, even though campaigns may be associated with higher levels of awareness and<br />

knowledge as argued by Wright et al, <strong>the</strong> evidence that this <strong>the</strong>n impacts on organisational<br />

attitudes and behaviour is not strong. This is for two reasons. First, some evaluations simply<br />

showed little evidence of campaigns having led to action, although this is partly because<br />

of <strong>the</strong> methodological problems involved in showing this. 3 Second, even where <strong>the</strong>re is an<br />

association between awareness of a campaign and propensity to take action on<br />

occupational health and safety (OHS) this does not mean that <strong>the</strong> one caused <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. As<br />

Hillage et al. argue in relation to Wright et al.’s evaluation of <strong>the</strong> ‘Good Health is Good<br />

Business’ campaign:<br />

“Aware organisations were more predisposed towards having an interest in health<br />

and safety issues in general, so <strong>the</strong> changes need not necessarily be attributed to<br />

<strong>the</strong> campaign.” 4<br />

A fur<strong>the</strong>r example of <strong>the</strong> weak link between awareness of a campaign and subsequent<br />

action can also be found in an evaluation of <strong>the</strong> HSC’s voluntary guidance on directors<br />

responsibilities for health and safety which we have discussed earlier (see chapter two).<br />

Magnitude and Quality of <strong>the</strong> Changes<br />

Even if changes or differences in attitude and behaviour between aware and unaware<br />

organisations could be attributed with any certainty to <strong>the</strong> impacts of a particular campaign,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are still questions as to <strong>the</strong> size and quality of <strong>the</strong> changes observed.<br />

A consideration of <strong>the</strong> evaluation of <strong>the</strong> ‘Good Health is Good Business’ (GHGB) campaign<br />

illustrates <strong>the</strong>se points. 5 The evaluation reports that, in relation to <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> campaign<br />

on employer attitudes, <strong>the</strong>re were statistically significant differences between organisations<br />

that were aware of <strong>the</strong> GHGB campaign and unaware organisations as regards some (but not<br />

all) attitudes towards occupational health.<br />

However, in absolute terms <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong>se differences is extremely small. For instance, <strong>the</strong><br />

researchers found a statistically significant difference in <strong>the</strong> extent of change in concern<br />

for employees’ health between those organisation that were “aware” and those that<br />

were “unaware”. On a scale of 1 to 5 (where 5 is “concern has greatly increased”) “aware”<br />

organisations score 3.9 and “unaware” organisations score 3.6. The researchers also<br />

reported a statistically significant difference in <strong>the</strong> perceived balance of costs and benefits of<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!