Chemical & Engineering News Digital Edition ... - IMM@BUCT
Chemical & Engineering News Digital Edition ... - IMM@BUCT
Chemical & Engineering News Digital Edition ... - IMM@BUCT
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
BUSINESS<br />
CHEMEXPLORER<br />
LILLY DROPS AN<br />
ANCHOR IN SHANGHAI<br />
Senior scientists staff new office COORDINATING R&D in China<br />
JEAN-FRANÇOIS TREMBLAY, C&EN HONG KONG<br />
LAST MONTH, a group of senior scientists<br />
from Eli Lilly & Co. started working out of<br />
an office in Shanghai’s Zhangjiang Hi-Tech<br />
Park. Rather than do research themselves,<br />
they are there to provide scientific leadership<br />
to the Chinese firms that Lilly has<br />
tasked with a steadily expanding range of<br />
R&D activities.<br />
“Large multinational drug companies<br />
conduct research in China either by building<br />
their own brick-and-mortar R&D<br />
centers or by building relationships with<br />
contract research organizations,” says<br />
Robert W. Armstrong, a Lilly vice president<br />
in charge of global external R&D. “We are<br />
in the second camp.”<br />
Non-U.S. pharmaceutical companies,<br />
including Novartis, AstraZeneca, Roche,<br />
and GlaxoSmithKline, have built or are in<br />
the process of building their own R&D centers<br />
in China. U.S. drug firms such as Lilly,<br />
Pfizer, and Merck & Co. have generally opted<br />
to take advantage of China’s scientists<br />
by collaborating with third parties there.<br />
Armstrong does not see the new coordination<br />
facility in Shanghai as contradicting<br />
Lilly’s aversion to brick-and-mortar investments<br />
in Chinese research. As the range<br />
and complexity of the R&D services Lilly<br />
purchased in China expanded, the need for<br />
a permanent scientific presence became<br />
clear. For one thing, Lilly can now better<br />
respond when a research partner in China<br />
comes up with lab results that are at odds<br />
with what scientists at the firm’s Indianapolis<br />
headquarters had expected.<br />
More important, the presence of experienced<br />
Lilly scientists in China improves the<br />
firm’s ability to identify promising research<br />
partners. “If we stay in Indiana, we’re going<br />
to be closing ourselves to the ideas that are<br />
elsewhere,” says William W. Chin, the Indianapolis-based<br />
vice president in charge of<br />
discovery research and clinical investigation.<br />
Lilly was motivated to come to China,<br />
Armstrong points out, because both patients<br />
and shareholders are demanding<br />
improvements in Lilly’s ability to bring innovative<br />
drugs to the market in a cost-efficient<br />
way. “We see partnerships as a mechanism<br />
to learn how to do things differently,<br />
not as a substitute for the things that we do<br />
right now” in the U.S., Armstrong says.<br />
Important for Lilly is that the availability<br />
of drug development services in China<br />
is steadily expanding. The same week that<br />
Lilly inaugurated its R&D center, three<br />
others opened biology service facilities in<br />
Shanghai: the U.S. firm Charles River; the<br />
Chinese company PharmaLegacy Laboratories;<br />
and Medicilon-MPI, a joint venture<br />
between China’s Shanghai Medicilon and<br />
Michigan-based MPI Research. Darren Ji,<br />
chief executive of PharmaLegacy, says his<br />
REACHING OUT<br />
In China, Lilly<br />
collaborates with<br />
local research<br />
companies such<br />
as Shanghai<br />
ChemExplorer,<br />
an employee of<br />
which is pictured<br />
here.<br />
company provides preclinical<br />
specialty pharmacology<br />
services.<br />
For the five years<br />
beginning in 2007 and<br />
running until 2011,<br />
Lilly will spend a minimum<br />
of $100 million<br />
on third-party research<br />
in China, says Tony Y.<br />
Zhang, the managing<br />
director of the new Shanghai center who<br />
relocated to China from the U.S. earlier<br />
this year.<br />
THROUGH ITS LOCAL PARTNERS, Lilly<br />
already employs 300 scientists in China, the<br />
majority of them chemists, Zhang points<br />
out. Shanghai ChemExplorer, a member<br />
of the Shangpharma contract research and<br />
manufacturing group, works exclusively on<br />
Lilly projects. About a year ago, Lilly set up<br />
a profit-sharing research collaboration with<br />
Shanghai-based Hutchison MediPharma<br />
(C&EN, Oct. 22, 2007, page 39).<br />
Lilly’s investment in the coordination<br />
center is modest, Zhang acknowledges. It<br />
consists of 5,500 sq ft of office space essentially<br />
devoid of scientific instruments.<br />
Zhang says Lilly’s scientists will make use<br />
of data and instrumentation supplied by<br />
the company’s Chinese partners. There are<br />
10 Lilly senior scientists from Indianapolis<br />
in China now, and Zhang expects that number<br />
could increase to 30.<br />
The group that Lilly has established<br />
in China may be small in number, but it<br />
is staffed with “drug hunters,” Chin says.<br />
These are scientists who over the years<br />
have demonstrated the ability to tease<br />
promising drug candidates out of the<br />
reams of data that discovery labs generate<br />
every day. For example, before Peter A.<br />
Lander relocated to Shanghai to become<br />
Lilly’s head of discovery chemistry in Asia,<br />
he was in charge of drug lead generation at<br />
the firm’s headquarters.<br />
Armstrong insists that Lilly employees<br />
in the U.S. don’t feel threatened by the company’s<br />
expansion in China. In response to<br />
cost pressure, “we have been challenged to<br />
do things differently,” he says. “China is part<br />
of a transformation agenda for our R&D.”<br />
According to Armstrong’s colleague<br />
Chin, merely cutting expenses and employees<br />
is not a smart way to contain the cost of<br />
bringing new drugs to market. “We have to<br />
have an innovation engine,” he says. “We<br />
cannot save our way into the new drugs for<br />
our patients of the future.” ■<br />
WWW.CEN-ONLINE.ORG 15 NOVEMBER 3, 2008