Chemical & Engineering News Digital Edition ... - IMM@BUCT
Chemical & Engineering News Digital Edition ... - IMM@BUCT
Chemical & Engineering News Digital Edition ... - IMM@BUCT
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
GOVERNMENT & POLICY CONCENTRATES<br />
FDA’S FOREIGN<br />
INSPECTION PROGRAM<br />
NEEDS OVERHAUL<br />
Better data management and more inspections<br />
are needed to strengthen FDA’s<br />
foreign drug facility inspection program,<br />
according to congressional investigators.<br />
The Government Accountability Office<br />
says the agency isn’t sure how many foreign<br />
establishments produce drugs for<br />
the U.S. market (GAO-08-970). Using a<br />
list of 3,249 plants FDA developed in 2007<br />
to prioritize foreign inspections, GAO<br />
estimates that FDA inspects only about<br />
8% of facilities outside the U.S. each year.<br />
“At this rate, it would take FDA more than<br />
13 years to inspect these establishments<br />
once,” GAO notes. Pharmaceutical plants<br />
in the U.S. are inspected on average every<br />
2.7 years. “This report confirms that we<br />
have reason to be concerned about the<br />
safety of imported drugs,” says House<br />
Energy & Commerce Committee Chairman<br />
John D. Dingell (D-Mich.). “Foreign<br />
inspections are alarmingly low.” The<br />
report also indicates that FDA is failing to<br />
promptly conduct follow-up inspections<br />
after serious violations—such as product<br />
impurities or record-keeping problems—<br />
are found in foreign facilities. From 2002<br />
through 2007, FDA issued 15 warning<br />
letters to foreign drug producers but reinspected<br />
only four of the facilities, the<br />
report notes.—GH<br />
SENATORS ASK EPA<br />
NOT TO ISSUE AIR RULE<br />
EU LISTS CHEMICALS OF CONCERN<br />
Following submissions from various European Union member countries,<br />
the European <strong>Chemical</strong>s Agency (ECHA) has put 15 chemicals on its candidate<br />
list of “substances of very high concern.” The list is part of the EU’s<br />
new regulatory program under the Registration, Evaluation & Authorization<br />
of <strong>Chemical</strong>s (REACH). “The inclusion of the substances in the list<br />
generates immediate new legal obligations” for companies producing,<br />
marketing, and using them, ECHA Executive Director Geert Dancet says.<br />
As of Dec. 1, 2011, a producer has to notify ECHA when a product contains<br />
more than 0.1% by weight of a substance on the candidate list, or when<br />
use totals more than 1 metric ton per year. Companies must also provide<br />
sufficient information on the safe use of the chemical or product to customers<br />
and consumers who request it. Inclusion on this list, some project,<br />
will encourage producers to develop more benign replacement chemicals.<br />
Publication of the list is “a welcome start, but a drop in the ocean,” given<br />
“the hundreds of well-known dangerous substances present in products<br />
used every day across Europe,” according to a statement released by a coalition<br />
of environmental and consumer public interest groups.—PLLS<br />
Because a federal court recently overturned<br />
a key Clean Air Act regulation, two powerful<br />
Senate Democrats are asking EPA not<br />
to issue a pending related rule that would<br />
relax some emissions controls on power<br />
plants. The pending rule, which the Bush<br />
Administration says it will finalize in coming<br />
weeks, is expected to boost air pollution<br />
from coal-fired power plants. This in turn<br />
is likely to pressure state environmental<br />
regulators to impose more stringent emissions<br />
controls on other industries, possibly<br />
including chemical plants, to maintain air<br />
quality. Proposed in 2005, the pending rule<br />
would allow utilities to renovate and expand<br />
the operating capacity of older power plants<br />
without having to install modern air pollution<br />
controls. EPA said any increase in annual<br />
pollution from power plants due to these<br />
proposed changes would be offset by another<br />
regulation called the Clean Air Interstate<br />
Rule (CAIR). But in July, a federal appeals<br />
court threw out CAIR (C&EN, July 21, page<br />
12). EPA needs to withdraw the pending rule<br />
because CAIR no longer exists, say Sens.<br />
Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), who chairs the<br />
Senate Environment & Public Works Committee,<br />
and Thomas R. Carper (D-Del.), who<br />
chairs the panel’s Subcommittee on Clean<br />
Air & Nuclear Safety.—CH<br />
DOE UPGRADES USER<br />
FACILITIES’ CONTRACTS<br />
On Oct. 27, the Department of Energy announced<br />
that it has streamlined access<br />
to user facilities, which offer researchers<br />
access to unique and expensive equipment<br />
and expertise, by making changes to<br />
technology transfer contracts. The new<br />
contracts clarify wording and provide a<br />
universal document that all DOE user facilities<br />
can employ. The two standardized<br />
contracts are designed to make it easier<br />
for university and industry scientists to<br />
use DOE’s research facilities. Under the<br />
proprietary agreement, users pay full cost<br />
for lab equipment use, and with limited<br />
exceptions, the researchers will retain<br />
all rights to the data and new inventions.<br />
For noncommercial and precompetitive<br />
research, researchers can use DOE’s equipment<br />
and collaborate with lab scientists<br />
under the nonproprietary agreement, but<br />
all data would be publicly available. The department<br />
hopes these contracts will speed<br />
up processing time, get researchers on-site,<br />
and increase collaborations. Researchers<br />
who already have contracts to use DOE<br />
facilities can expect the agreements to be<br />
executed as originally written.—RFHB<br />
GROUP PROMOTES USE<br />
OF GREENER CHEMICALS<br />
Executives from the electronics, health<br />
care, retail, and building sectors are<br />
joining with health and environmental<br />
advocates to promote the development<br />
and use of safer chemicals. On Oct. 29,<br />
the Business-NGO Working Group for<br />
Safer <strong>Chemical</strong>s & Sustainable Materials<br />
unveiled principles designed to encourage<br />
chemical producers to supply compounds<br />
with low to no toxicity and which degrade<br />
into innocuous substances. The principles<br />
call for manufacturers to identify the<br />
chemicals that are used to make or are<br />
contained in a product and for buyers to<br />
request chemical data from their suppliers.<br />
In addition, they call for manufacturers<br />
to determine the hazards of substances<br />
in their products; use chemicals with<br />
inherently low hazard potential; and target<br />
persistent, bioaccumulative, or toxic<br />
compounds for elimination. Roger McFadden,<br />
vice president of product science and<br />
technology for Corporate Express, an arm<br />
of office products retailer Staples, explains<br />
that the principles “mark a significant step<br />
toward incorporating green chemistry into<br />
consumer goods.” —CH<br />
WWW.CEN-ONLINE.ORG 17 NOVEMBER 3, 2008