08.11.2014 Views

Modern Polymer Spect..

Modern Polymer Spect..

Modern Polymer Spect..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

254 5 Vibrational <strong>Spect</strong>voscopj? of Polypeptides<br />

Keeping in mind that the peptide groups are not identical, because of the different<br />

chemical surroundings, we find that aniide I frequencies, because of their highly<br />

localized nature, generally follow the changes in CO s force constants with conformation<br />

[33]. These in turn are determined by the changes in CO bond length (the<br />

relationship is essentially linear [33]), which reflect the changing bonded and nonbonded<br />

interactions in the molecule with conformation. The larger variation in CO<br />

s2 (41 cm-') than in CO sl (16 cni-'1 is probably a result of its more variable conformational<br />

environinent adjacent to C", and therefore the varying (even if small)<br />

contributions of other coordinates. It is interesting that in a' the frequency order is<br />

reversed compared with the other conformers.<br />

The aiiiide I1 modes are less sensitive to conformation: the variation in either<br />

mode is of the order of 10 cm-', although the splittings do vary. As with amide I,<br />

the different frequencies of the two groups are mainly a reflection of their nonidentical<br />

chemical environments.<br />

The latter fact is demonstrated dramatically by the aniide I11 mode: the eigenvectors<br />

for the two peptide groups are significantly different, that of the higher fre-<br />

quency mode containing no PED contribution (210) of H" bend (b) although this<br />

coordinate is a major contributor to the lower frequency mode. Nor is NH ib a<br />

major contributor, as it was in NMA (in fact, it does not appear in the p2 modes).<br />

The large variations in frequency separation between the two amide I11 modes<br />

reflect the effect of conformation through H" b, since if H" is replaced by D" this<br />

variation disappears (the bands are now at 1294 & 1 and 1266 k 6 cin-'j [33]. This<br />

agrees with previous observations [5] that the amide I11 mode in polypeptides contains<br />

a significant conformation-dependent contribution from H" b. The interaction<br />

between H" b and NH ib is illustrated by the fact that in an (ND)? Ala dipeptide<br />

H" b occurs at 1300 and 1296 (p2), 1320 and 1272 ( a~),<br />

1305 and 1283 ( a~), and<br />

1324 and 1284 (a') cm-' [33]. The H" b coordinate also mixes with CN s to predict<br />

significant IR bands at 1277 cm-' in p2 and 1291 cm-' in a' [33]. Thus, with its<br />

added sensitivity to side-chain composition [5], amide I11 in polypeptides is no<br />

longer a simple characteristic NH ib, CN s mode.<br />

The amide V mode, which appears as a single band near 400 cn-' in NMA (see<br />

Table 5-l ), is split in the nonhydrogen-bonded conformers into at least two bands<br />

with predominant NH ob, CN t contributions. (These paired coordinates can make<br />

significant contributions to other modes, and each contributes individually to still<br />

others.) It might be thought that this splitting (and higher average frequency) is<br />

a result of the arbitrary scale factors that were used [33]. However, 4-31G" calculations<br />

with scale factors transferred from NMA [59] give similar results [73]. Thus,<br />

we must conclude that kinematic as well as potential coupling between the two<br />

peptide groups is responsible for the nonlocalized contribution of these coupled<br />

coordinates.<br />

The presence of hydrogen bonding obviously introduces a new element into the<br />

modes of the Ala dipeptide. This can be examined from the results on the three<br />

stable hydrogen-bonded conformers, C5, C7E, and C7A (Figure 5-1) [34]. In Table<br />

5-3 we show their calculated amide I, 11, 111, and V frequencies and PEDs.<br />

The relative amide I mode frequencies again generally follow the relative values<br />

of the CO s force constants [34], although mixing of the two CO s displacements can

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!